1997
DOI: 10.3928/0147-7447-19971001-04
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

'Clearing' Cervical Spine Injuries in Polytrauma Patients: Is It Really Safe to Remove the Collar?

Abstract: Polytrauma patients are at increased risk for occult cervical spine injuries. Those unable to provide clinical dues to injury either remain in hard collars until they are able to cooperate with the physical examination or are deemed "clear of cervical injury" if the emergency room screening radiographs are without obvious bony abnormality. Cervical immobilization for a lengthy period of time is not without morbidity. Missed ligamentous injuries can lead to cervical instability, which in turn can result in perm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 66 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there is still ongoing debate on the characteristic radiologic signs and the significance of OLMI asymmetry (normal variant vs. pathologic finding) [38][39][40] related to the occipitoatlantoaxial traumatic lesions [41]. In fact, the plethora of guidance [42][43][44][45][46][47] reflects incomplete and inadequate data and further contributes to practice variance [20,[48][49][50]. Moreover, many patients undergo technically inadequate studies with inaccurate interpretations…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is still ongoing debate on the characteristic radiologic signs and the significance of OLMI asymmetry (normal variant vs. pathologic finding) [38][39][40] related to the occipitoatlantoaxial traumatic lesions [41]. In fact, the plethora of guidance [42][43][44][45][46][47] reflects incomplete and inadequate data and further contributes to practice variance [20,[48][49][50]. Moreover, many patients undergo technically inadequate studies with inaccurate interpretations…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%