2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2004.03666.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clearing the cervical spine in unconscious polytrauma victims, balancing risks and effective screening

Abstract: SummaryCervical spine injury occurs in 5-10% of cases of blunt polytrauma. A missed or delayed diagnosis of cervical spine injury may be associated with permanent neurological sequelae. However, there is no consensus about the ideal evaluation and management of the potentially injured cervical spine and, despite the publication of numerous clinical guidelines, this issue remains controversial. In addition, many studies are limited in their application to the obtunded or unconscious trauma victim. This review w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
78
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 180 publications
(287 reference statements)
1
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To that end, therapeutic algorithms need to address the outermost importance of SI in MI-patients including a standardized diagnostic work-up of the spine. The exact diagnostic procedures to achieve this result remain a matter of discussion -CT-scanning is available in most traumacenters and meanwhile considered the golden standard [26] due to lower cost [27], diagnostic accuracy [22,[28][29][30][31] and speed [32], however, others still employ plain radiographs [33] especially for screening the axial skeleton before performing CT-scans of a suspicious region [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To that end, therapeutic algorithms need to address the outermost importance of SI in MI-patients including a standardized diagnostic work-up of the spine. The exact diagnostic procedures to achieve this result remain a matter of discussion -CT-scanning is available in most traumacenters and meanwhile considered the golden standard [26] due to lower cost [27], diagnostic accuracy [22,[28][29][30][31] and speed [32], however, others still employ plain radiographs [33] especially for screening the axial skeleton before performing CT-scans of a suspicious region [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Often adequate monitoring cannot be provided in the MRI-unit. Additionally, the relatively large amount of time needed for data acquisition (approximately 30 min) restricts this diagnostic method to special cases, where neurologic symptoms are present without any lesions of the spine visualized by CT [7,8,10,[24][25][26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover diagnostic work up of suspected cervical spine injury varies from solely plain radiographs to whole body CTscan [4,[6][7][8][9][10][11]. Additionally, the timing of surgical intervention in acute management of spinal trauma remains controversial [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 the spine of the obtunded blunt trauma patient (OBTP) who is likely to remain unevaluable. Previous reviews and practice guidelines on this topic were produced in 2004, and adopted by the United Kingdom Intensive Care Society [1,2].…”
Section: Background and Limitations Of The Current Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 99%