2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-022-07841-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cleavage fracture micromechanisms in thick-section quenched and tempered S690 high-strength steels

Abstract: For structural assessment and optimal design of thick-section high-strength steels in applications under harsh service conditions, it is essential to understand the cleavage fracture micromechanisms. In this study, we assess the effects of through-thickness microstructure of an 80-mm-thick quenched and tempered S690 high-strength steel, notch orientation, and crack tip constraint in cleavage nucleation and propagation via sub-sized crack tip opening displacement (CTOD) testing at −100 °C. The notch was placed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 41 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Goss {110}<001> or rotated Goss {110}<110> texture components [36] along the fusion line region are very likely the results of formation and decomposition of austenite during the repeated multipass welding thermal cycles. Such an evolution of Goss {110} texture has been confirmed by others, such as Cerda et al [37] and Bertolo et al [38], for steels undergoing rapid heating at a higher rate than 150 °C/s. Welding heating is often faster than this.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The Goss {110}<001> or rotated Goss {110}<110> texture components [36] along the fusion line region are very likely the results of formation and decomposition of austenite during the repeated multipass welding thermal cycles. Such an evolution of Goss {110} texture has been confirmed by others, such as Cerda et al [37] and Bertolo et al [38], for steels undergoing rapid heating at a higher rate than 150 °C/s. Welding heating is often faster than this.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%