2024
DOI: 10.1080/14616696.2023.2300641
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cleavage politics in ordinary reasoning: How common sense divides

Koen Damhuis,
Linus Westheuser
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 87 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies indicate that similar commonsensical prioritizations-and the perceived provocation thereof-are crucial to understand the political reasoning of ordinary citizens, in which moral intuitions and affectively charged group distinctions, taken from the domain of everyday life, loom particularly large (one thinks of "hard-working, " "lazy-bones, " "do-gooders, " "rule breakers, " etc. ; see, e.g., Bornschier et al, 2021;Mau et al, 2023;Damhuis and Westheuser, 2024;Zollinger, 2024). Accordingly, future research could focus more closely on the different mobilizations of resentment we identified, and the corresponding "inversions of commonsensical priorities" they entail, to develop a better understanding of the electoral appeal of PRRPs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Recent studies indicate that similar commonsensical prioritizations-and the perceived provocation thereof-are crucial to understand the political reasoning of ordinary citizens, in which moral intuitions and affectively charged group distinctions, taken from the domain of everyday life, loom particularly large (one thinks of "hard-working, " "lazy-bones, " "do-gooders, " "rule breakers, " etc. ; see, e.g., Bornschier et al, 2021;Mau et al, 2023;Damhuis and Westheuser, 2024;Zollinger, 2024). Accordingly, future research could focus more closely on the different mobilizations of resentment we identified, and the corresponding "inversions of commonsensical priorities" they entail, to develop a better understanding of the electoral appeal of PRRPs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%