2014
DOI: 10.1111/liv.12572
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

(Cleaved) CK18 serum and tissue expression levels differentiate acute HCV reinfection from acute rejection in liver allografts

Abstract: M30-, M65-ELISAs and M30-immunohistochemistry are potential useful tools in differentiating acute HCV reinfection from acute rejection facilitating both speed and accuracy of the diagnostic process for the clinician and hepatopathologist. In this context, M65S provided superior diagnostic characteristics compared to M30-based methods. However, being the first analysis of (cleaved) CK18 serum and tissue expression levels in this context, the results need to be verified in further studies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While this was the first analysis of the predictive value of CK18 levels for graft injury after liver transplantation beyond hepatitis C 28 , the association of DSA with graft injury in general is a well described phenomenon 4,12,14,16,18,20,21 . However, we are not aware of another study with a specific focus on non-invasive capacities of both parameters in comparison to the routine blood markers to detect subclinical graft injury in adults.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this was the first analysis of the predictive value of CK18 levels for graft injury after liver transplantation beyond hepatitis C 28 , the association of DSA with graft injury in general is a well described phenomenon 4,12,14,16,18,20,21 . However, we are not aware of another study with a specific focus on non-invasive capacities of both parameters in comparison to the routine blood markers to detect subclinical graft injury in adults.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the study of Joka et al [ 35 ], it was found that M65 was an additional indicator of a complementary M30, since it reflects the processes of necrosis. Reis et al [ 36 ] in a study involving 76 patients with CHC after OLTx (orthotopic liver transplantation) measured M30S, M30H CK-18, and M65 CK-18 concentrations and found that these markers were able to discriminate between acute reinfection and acute transplant rejection ( P = 0.048, P = 0.001, and P = 0.010). Only few studies have evaluated both fragments of M30 and M65-CK 18 in CHB.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Validation of CK-18, CK-18 fragments and ELF have been conducted in NAFLD and NASH. [28][29][30]56 The very fact that biomarkers can differentiate between NAFLD and NASH [30][31][32] indicates that the manifestations of changes in hepatic biomarkers can be defined by aetiology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%