1966
DOI: 10.1097/00006534-196638060-00010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cleft Palate Not Explained by Embryology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is a common occurrence though not a rule that the congenital palatal stula and submucous cleft palate are commonly associated. Lynch JB et al [6] in 1966 reported congenital palatal stula not associated with submucous cleft palate. There was not history of trauma, occurred in children and the same location as reported in the present case report.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a common occurrence though not a rule that the congenital palatal stula and submucous cleft palate are commonly associated. Lynch JB et al [6] in 1966 reported congenital palatal stula not associated with submucous cleft palate. There was not history of trauma, occurred in children and the same location as reported in the present case report.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 3 5 In other cases, intact submucous clefts have been recorded before appearance of a fistula or perforation, supporting the hypothesis of a spontaneous rupture or a traumatic etiology. 5 , 6 However, Lynch et al 7 and others have reported congenital palatal fistulas that are truly isolated, occurring in the absence of a submucous cleft palate. 1 , 8 These still occurred in the same location and presented early in childhood without a history of trauma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, in other studies, the mucosa in the submucous cleft palate was intact at birth but subsequently presented with a hole, suggesting spontaneous rupture or a traumatic etiology [5610]. In several reports, submucous cleft palate was not accompanied by palatal perforation, suggesting that it occurred due to an embryological malformation [13]. The present case strongly supports the former etiology; that is, oral candidiasis was the cause of palatal fenestration, which is supported by the photograph taken before the perforation (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%