2022
DOI: 10.1109/lra.2021.3138326
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CLEVERarm: A Lightweight and Compact Exoskeleton for Upper-Limb Rehabilitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is important to remember that this is a prototype. In the future, the device's weight be reduced by reshaping the exoskeleton components to optimize their stiffness-to-weight ratio and adopting lightweight, high-strength materials like carbon fiber whose usage in similar wearable systems has been already proven in several studies [26][27][28].…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is important to remember that this is a prototype. In the future, the device's weight be reduced by reshaping the exoskeleton components to optimize their stiffness-to-weight ratio and adopting lightweight, high-strength materials like carbon fiber whose usage in similar wearable systems has been already proven in several studies [26][27][28].…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both EE type robotic devices and exoskeletons have been used in randomized controlled trials (RCT) for subacute and chronic stroke rehabilitation. Examples of commercialized rehabilitation exoskeletons include the Armeo Spring, Armeo Power, and Myomo and those of research ones include Harmony [108], NESM [107], HEXO [162], NTUH-II [163], Aalborg University Exoskeleton [106], ALEx [164], EXO-UL8 [165], FELXO-Arm1 [166], CleverARM [167], etc, with typical ones shown in figure 2. In addition, concomitant therapies have also been adopted to enhance rehabilitation including virtual reality [168] and conventional stroke therapies.…”
Section: Stroke Rehabilitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the simplification of the upper limb to six degrees of freedom (DOFs) and below is inconsistent with the physiological properties of the upper limb. Meanwhile, a sizable research has been conducted for modeling upper-limb motion, including dissecting shoulder motion during the design of the upper-limb exoskeleton (ARMin series 39 – 41 , HARMONY 42 , CLEVERarm 43 , WINDER 44 , ChARMin 45 , etc.) and developing Denavit-Hartenberg based models of upper limb forward and reverse kinematics and dynamics 46 , 47 , hybrid twist-based model of shoulder kinematics 48 , rigid body model describing the kinematics of the scapula relative to the sternum 49 , and a musculoskeletal model of the upper limb 50 52 , etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%