2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2012.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Client and consultant engagement in public sector IS projects

Abstract: Engagement between clients and consultants has been identified as important in

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A second direction pertains to the relationship between client-consultant engagement and knowledge creation during ERP implementation. Hartnett et al (2012) posit that client-consultant engagement in IS projects can be understood as a dynamic self-reinforcing interaction between three conditions (environment, participants and expertise) and three behaviors (sharing, sense-making and adapting). This model can help stimulate interesting questions such as, “how can better sense-making of the implementation by users in a manufacturing company improve the knowledge-creation process?”, “how do consultants adapt their learnings from manufacturing environments to service environments for successful knowledge creation during ERP implementation?” and so on.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second direction pertains to the relationship between client-consultant engagement and knowledge creation during ERP implementation. Hartnett et al (2012) posit that client-consultant engagement in IS projects can be understood as a dynamic self-reinforcing interaction between three conditions (environment, participants and expertise) and three behaviors (sharing, sense-making and adapting). This model can help stimulate interesting questions such as, “how can better sense-making of the implementation by users in a manufacturing company improve the knowledge-creation process?”, “how do consultants adapt their learnings from manufacturing environments to service environments for successful knowledge creation during ERP implementation?” and so on.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This requires operational level managers to somehow raise their IT and performance measurement literacy to a level conducive with effective deployment (Rikhardsson and Kraemmergaard, 2006). Thus, when the expertise is not available internally, TMT support also includes facilitating the acquisition and importation of the necessary knowledge from outside the organization (such as the use of consultants and customized training) (Purvis et al, 2000;Hartnett et al, 2012;Leiby, 2018).…”
Section: Theory and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Avgerou, 2003). Actors involved might span the public-private spheres, for example, technology consultants, vendors and entrepreneurs might engage in public-private partnerships with government actors (Hartnett, Daniel, & Holti, 2012;Saint-Martin, 2000). In the pre-implementation stage, vast sums of typically donor money are invested in sourcing, purchasing and contracting and this creates susceptibility to the kinds of corruption associated with public project spending in developing countries such as bribery for contracts, kickbacks, self-dealing, cronyism or even the theft of project funds (Locatelli, Mariani, Sainati, & Greco, 2017).…”
Section: Digitalization Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%