Clientelist and Programmatic Factionalism Within Malaysian Political Parties

Abstract

This article analyses factionalism within ruling and opposition parties in Malaysia, with a focus on party splits and/or the toppling or near-toppling of dominant factions at the national level. Political parties are either composed of clientelist or programmatic factions or represent hybrids that combine clientelist and programmatic factionalism. The strength and the type of factionalism depend upon policy space and the intensity of control over party groups. Programmatic factionalism is more probable if policy space is wide. Policy space is an effect of the positioning (relatively dependent or independent from other parties in the coalition) and the basic ideology of a party, that is, the major stance on religion, ethnicity, and the shape of the political system at large. If there is hardly any policy space, factionalism will be clientelistic rather than programmatic. Whether this type of factionalism arises is contingent upon the intensity of control over groups within the party and the availability of patronage goods. The control of party members is dependent upon the strength of the party leader and the centralisation of party organisation. This is demonstrated with reference to UMNO (United Malays National Organisation) (from programmatic to clientelist factionalism), some coalition partners of UMNO such as the MCA (Malaysian Chinese Association) (clientelist factionalism), and the Islamist PAS (Parti Islam Se-Malaysia) (programmatic clientelism). Moreover, a brief analysis of East Malaysian parties in Sabah and Sarawak helps to further elucidate the major dynamics of factionalism.

Challenges of Ethnic Party Adaptation in Power-Sharing Systems: Evidence from Malaysia

“…Throughout the country's most authoritarian period, the DAP's identity and organization remained stable. This stability is in part due to the centralization of power and personalism of the party (Ufen, 2020: 66), which was led for a combined 47 years by the prominent politician Lim Kit Siang or his son, Lim Guan Eng. After the creation of the BN in 1973, which reconstituted the ruling coalition under UMNO's dominance and co-opted many of its opponents, the DAP was the only significant Chinese party to remain in opposition (Heng, 1996: 512).…”

“…Additionally, although the DAP has avoided outright ideological splits or factionalism (Ufen, 2020), not all leaders within the party endorse diversification. The trade-offs involved in diversification have been a matter of internal debate, one that occasionally spills out into public view.…”

Political Trust Study: A Review

“…No wonder non-democratic regime such as China still able to enjoy a moderately high level of public trust (Wang, 2017), but most democracies fall to the all-time low (Levi & Stoker, 2000). Unsurprisingly, a culturally diverse society can be easily trapped into clientelism, and constant factionalism, by relying on political patronage for the interest of each party (Ufen, 2020). For instance, the most recent political crisis in Malaysia during the coronavirus outbreak, popularly known as "Sheraton Move", has shocked the nation and international community alike.…”

The Downfall of Pakatan Harapan in Malaysia

“…The 13 East Malaysian parties in the national parliament are often more clientelistic than programmatic in orientation and can quickly switch sides . In recent years, factionalism and party splits have significantly increased in West Malaysia, too (Ufen 2020b). The emergence of new coalitions started in mid-2015 at the party congress of PAS, where the conservative wing was able to sideline reformers-who are much more inclined to form coalitions with rather secular parties, such as the predominantly ethnic-Chinese Democratic Action Party (DAP) and the mostly ethnic-Malay Parti Keadilan Rakyat (People's Justice Party, PKR).…”