1991
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.1991.tb00404.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clients' community and social contacts: results of a 5‐year longitudinal study

Abstract: ABSTRACT. Clients’ contacts with a range of community amenities and with their friends and relatives were examined to assess the impact of a new community‐based service. Results over a 5‐year period were compared for clients in different residential settings: supported ordinary housing, mental handicap hospital and private family homes. Findings indicated increased use of community amenities for those in supported housing and in their family homes. Little change was noted in clients’ contact with relatives, an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Increases in the range and frequency of community activities were experienced for people in all residential settings other than hospital, although this finding should be treated witb caution because of the lower reliability of information in this area. Those who moved from traditional residential settings to the community experienced the most dramatic change and this serves to highlight the fact that place of residence can have a major impact on community life, a result consistent with other resettlement research (see Firth & Short 1987;de Kock et al 1988;Lowe & de Paiva 1991b). However, although there were signs that people with mental handicaps were becoming increasingly involved in ordinary rather than specialist community activities, it was equally clear that the divide between community presence and social participation remains as great as ever.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Increases in the range and frequency of community activities were experienced for people in all residential settings other than hospital, although this finding should be treated witb caution because of the lower reliability of information in this area. Those who moved from traditional residential settings to the community experienced the most dramatic change and this serves to highlight the fact that place of residence can have a major impact on community life, a result consistent with other resettlement research (see Firth & Short 1987;de Kock et al 1988;Lowe & de Paiva 1991b). However, although there were signs that people with mental handicaps were becoming increasingly involved in ordinary rather than specialist community activities, it was equally clear that the divide between community presence and social participation remains as great as ever.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…). Lowe & De Paiva () focussed on individuals administratively categorised as ‘mentally handicapped’ or in receipt of ‘mental handicap services’ within a catchment area of a new local, community‐based service. Two other studies in the review focused on parents with learning disabilities (McConnell et al .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Use of Community Facilities Scale (UCFS) was used as a measure of social participation by Chou et al . () and Lowe & De Paiva () also gathered data on the use of community facilities. Additionally, social participation was measured using category of contacts (Broer et al .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NIMROD'S eligibility criteria included every person with mental handicap from a defined geographical area, regardless of age or degree of disability. Results of other variables studied as part of this longitudinal evaluation have indicated beneficial gains in terms of skill development (Lowe & de Paiva, in prep) and community contact (Lowe & de Paiva, 1991) across the age and ability spectrum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%