Abstract:We propose a new measure of private information in decentralized marketsconnections-which exploits the time variation in the number of dealers with whom a client trades in a time period. Using trade-level data for the U.K. government bond market, we show that clients perform better when having more connections as their trades predict future price movements. Time variation in market-wide connections also helps explain yield dynamics. Given our novel measure, we present two applications suggesting that (i) deale… Show more
“…The inclusion of client-day fixed effects allows us to control for the effects of such time-varying, client-specific shocks. This also strengthens our empirical design compared to previous studies such as Kondor and Pinter (2022) which did not exploit asset-level heterogeneity. Another possible concern is that our results are driven by correlated trading needs of uninformed investors, resulting in a spurious correlation between bond returns and client connections.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…However, the effects at the baseline client-day-bond level are about five times larger than those at the client-day level. This suggests that asset-level heterogeneity plays an important role for informational trading in corporate bond markets, particularly when compared to government bond markets (Kondor and Pinter, 2022).…”
Section: A1 Description Of Robustness Checks Client-day Level Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we are able to extend our analysis of corporate bond markets, and contrast it to studies on government bond markets (e.g. Kondor and Pinter, 2022). Specifically, we can estimate how the sensitivity of performance to client connections differs between corporate and government bond markets, while controlling for unobserved heterogeneity at the client-day level, e.g.…”
Section: Connections In Corporate Bond Vs Government Bond Marketsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance measures are in %-points. We include the natural logarithm of both the pound trade volume of the particular client in the given market ("Volume") and her number of trades ("# Trades") as additional controls, as in Kondor and Pinter (2022). To reduce noise, we winsorise the sample at the 1%-level.…”
Section: Profits Of Informed From 2 Connections (Relative To 1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Closest to our empirical analysis are two recent papers. First, Kondor and Pinter (2022) analyses the relation between client-dealer connections and performance in government bond markets. Compared to their approach, we exploit the asset-level heterogeneity as well as other specific features of corporate bond markets to develop our empirical tests; and we are also able to compare the effects of connections across markets by identifying a common set of clients operating simultaneously in corporate and government bond markets.…”
“…The inclusion of client-day fixed effects allows us to control for the effects of such time-varying, client-specific shocks. This also strengthens our empirical design compared to previous studies such as Kondor and Pinter (2022) which did not exploit asset-level heterogeneity. Another possible concern is that our results are driven by correlated trading needs of uninformed investors, resulting in a spurious correlation between bond returns and client connections.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…However, the effects at the baseline client-day-bond level are about five times larger than those at the client-day level. This suggests that asset-level heterogeneity plays an important role for informational trading in corporate bond markets, particularly when compared to government bond markets (Kondor and Pinter, 2022).…”
Section: A1 Description Of Robustness Checks Client-day Level Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we are able to extend our analysis of corporate bond markets, and contrast it to studies on government bond markets (e.g. Kondor and Pinter, 2022). Specifically, we can estimate how the sensitivity of performance to client connections differs between corporate and government bond markets, while controlling for unobserved heterogeneity at the client-day level, e.g.…”
Section: Connections In Corporate Bond Vs Government Bond Marketsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance measures are in %-points. We include the natural logarithm of both the pound trade volume of the particular client in the given market ("Volume") and her number of trades ("# Trades") as additional controls, as in Kondor and Pinter (2022). To reduce noise, we winsorise the sample at the 1%-level.…”
Section: Profits Of Informed From 2 Connections (Relative To 1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Closest to our empirical analysis are two recent papers. First, Kondor and Pinter (2022) analyses the relation between client-dealer connections and performance in government bond markets. Compared to their approach, we exploit the asset-level heterogeneity as well as other specific features of corporate bond markets to develop our empirical tests; and we are also able to compare the effects of connections across markets by identifying a common set of clients operating simultaneously in corporate and government bond markets.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.