“…Furthermore, given that an FPP makes an SPP conditionally relevant, by remaining silent, the person to whom the FPP is addressed flouts the obligation to respond that is instituted through the initiating action. Resisting by withholding an SPP and remaining silent has been documented, for example, in healthcare interactions, specifically in treatment recommendation sequences in primary care (Koenig, 2011), pediatric (Stivers, 2005a(Stivers, , 2007, and psychiatric consultations (Kushida & Yamakawa, 2020), and in sales encounters, specifically at the sales relevance place (Pinch & Clark, 1986, p. 171), the point where an acceptance of the proposed sale becomes pertinent (Clark, Drew et al, 1994;Clark & Pinch, 2001). Additionally, silence can embody resistance not only in the sequential environment of adjacency pairs, but also in extended tellings, at points where recipients' affiliation would be relevant, such as after tellers deploy idioms to summarize their stances (Kitzinger, 2000).…”