2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2006.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clifford algebra-parametrized octonions and generalizations

Abstract: Introducing products between multivectors of Cl(0,7) and octonions, resulting in an octonion, and leading to the non-associative standard octonionic product in a particular case, we generalize the octonionic X-product, associated with the transformation rules for bosonic and fermionic fields on the tangent bundle over the 7-sphere, and the XY-product. We also present the formalism necessary to construct Clifford algebra-parametrized octonions. Finally we introduce a method to construct generalized octonionic a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…What is interesting, though presumably not surprising, is the fact that this irregular jumping through dimensions of the Clifford algebra, on the one hand, and of the spinor field, on the other hand, renders such a sensitivity to the dimension quite erratic: as is well known, in 4 dimensions the spinor fields have 4 complex components, and thus 8 real components, but only 2 degrees of freedom, whereas in 2 dimensions they have 2 complex components, thus 4 real components, with 3 degrees of freedom. Such results are common knowledge for spinor classification in various dimensions as discussed in [5][6][7][8], where some very general treatments are done which also include the enlargements to arbitrary signatures and up to octonion-valued fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…What is interesting, though presumably not surprising, is the fact that this irregular jumping through dimensions of the Clifford algebra, on the one hand, and of the spinor field, on the other hand, renders such a sensitivity to the dimension quite erratic: as is well known, in 4 dimensions the spinor fields have 4 complex components, and thus 8 real components, but only 2 degrees of freedom, whereas in 2 dimensions they have 2 complex components, thus 4 real components, with 3 degrees of freedom. Such results are common knowledge for spinor classification in various dimensions as discussed in [5][6][7][8], where some very general treatments are done which also include the enlargements to arbitrary signatures and up to octonion-valued fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…are all real tensors as it is easy to demonstrate. With (7) and these bilinear quantities it is possible to prove the validity of relationships…”
Section: The General Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. , e 7 } be the basis of and denote the set W by (1,4,5), (2,4,6), (3,4,7), (2,5,7), (6,1,7), (5,3,6) .…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since ζ is assumed to be always invertible, the product is not automorphic to the product of the original algebras [22]. Given A ∈ A, ζ -applications are defined as…”
Section: Associative Isotopic Algebrasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, it leads naturally to remarkable geometric and topological properties, for instance the Hopf fibrations S 3 · · · S 7 → S 4 and S 8 · · · S 15 → S 7 [30][31][32], and twistor formalism in ten dimensions [23,24]. Generalizations of these topics are developed in [22]. We also extend the product ζ to the ζ -isotope (ζ ) A of A, in such a way that for this case we have…”
Section: Non-associative Isotopymentioning
confidence: 99%