“…Namely, Remark 7.32 implies that pS ' S˚, ∇ ∇q has a canonical nonflat trivialization over the subset M pSq o Ă M pSq of nondegenerate mass pairings. (This uses [93] and [94, §4].) The nonflat trivialization lifts the deformation class of the anomaly-the cohomology class underlying (7.43)-to a relative class in IZp1q d`2 pX, X o q, where X o " MSpin RiemˆM pSq o .…”
It is customary to couple a quantum system to external classical fields. One application is to couple the global symmetries of the system (including the Poincaré symmetry) to background gauge fields (and a metric for the Poincaré symmetry). Failure of gauge invariance of the partition function under gauge transformations of these fields reflects 't Hooft anomalies. It is also common to view the ordinary (scalar) coupling constants as background fields, i.e. to study the theory when they are spacetime dependent. We will show that the notion of 't Hooft anomalies can be extended naturally to include these scalar background fields. Just as ordinary 't Hooft anomalies allow us to deduce dynamical consequences about the phases of the theory and its defects, the same is true for these generalized 't Hooft anomalies. Specifically, since the coupling constants vary, we can learn that certain phase transitions must be present. We will demonstrate these anomalies and their applications in simple pedagogical examples in one dimension (quantum mechanics) and in some two, three, and four-dimensional quantum field theories. An anomaly is an example of an invertible field theory, which can be described as an object in (generalized) differential cohomology. We give an introduction to this perspective. Also, we use Quillen's superconnections to derive the anomaly for a free spinor field with variable mass. In a companion paper we will study four-dimensional gauge theories showing how our view unifies and extends many recently obtained results.2 In condensed matter physics, symmetry protected topological orders (SPTs) are also characterized at low energies by such actions. Depending on the precise definitions and context, "SPT" may be synonymous with "invertible field theory", or may instead refer to the deformation class of an invertible field theory, i.e. the equivalence class of invertible theories obtained by continuously varying parameters.3 In certain cases, there is no Y such that BY " X and A on X is extended into Y . Then, one can construct an anomaly free partition function by assuming that X is a component of the boundary of Y and Y has additional boundary components.
“…Namely, Remark 7.32 implies that pS ' S˚, ∇ ∇q has a canonical nonflat trivialization over the subset M pSq o Ă M pSq of nondegenerate mass pairings. (This uses [93] and [94, §4].) The nonflat trivialization lifts the deformation class of the anomaly-the cohomology class underlying (7.43)-to a relative class in IZp1q d`2 pX, X o q, where X o " MSpin RiemˆM pSq o .…”
It is customary to couple a quantum system to external classical fields. One application is to couple the global symmetries of the system (including the Poincaré symmetry) to background gauge fields (and a metric for the Poincaré symmetry). Failure of gauge invariance of the partition function under gauge transformations of these fields reflects 't Hooft anomalies. It is also common to view the ordinary (scalar) coupling constants as background fields, i.e. to study the theory when they are spacetime dependent. We will show that the notion of 't Hooft anomalies can be extended naturally to include these scalar background fields. Just as ordinary 't Hooft anomalies allow us to deduce dynamical consequences about the phases of the theory and its defects, the same is true for these generalized 't Hooft anomalies. Specifically, since the coupling constants vary, we can learn that certain phase transitions must be present. We will demonstrate these anomalies and their applications in simple pedagogical examples in one dimension (quantum mechanics) and in some two, three, and four-dimensional quantum field theories. An anomaly is an example of an invertible field theory, which can be described as an object in (generalized) differential cohomology. We give an introduction to this perspective. Also, we use Quillen's superconnections to derive the anomaly for a free spinor field with variable mass. In a companion paper we will study four-dimensional gauge theories showing how our view unifies and extends many recently obtained results.2 In condensed matter physics, symmetry protected topological orders (SPTs) are also characterized at low energies by such actions. Depending on the precise definitions and context, "SPT" may be synonymous with "invertible field theory", or may instead refer to the deformation class of an invertible field theory, i.e. the equivalence class of invertible theories obtained by continuously varying parameters.3 In certain cases, there is no Y such that BY " X and A on X is extended into Y . Then, one can construct an anomaly free partition function by assuming that X is a component of the boundary of Y and Y has additional boundary components.
“…In presence of symmetries that act non-trivially in φ glob this is not the case. Gauge symmetries can be treated as described in [6,5,1], where, essentially, the thimble is defined modulo gauge transformations. But this is not suitable to study the possibility of spontaneous symmetry breaking (SSB).…”
Abstract. Recently, we have introduced a novel approach to deal with the sign problem that prevents the Monte Carlo simulations of a class of quantum field theories (QFTs). The idea is to formulate the QFT on a Lefschetz thimble. Here we review the formulation of our approach and describe the Aurora Monte Carlo algorithm that we are currently testing on a scalar field theory with a sign problem.
“…The pullback bundle i * m T r * (j m ) coincides with (3.5). Then BSpin(m) is simply connected for m ≥ 2: this is the consequence of the exact sequence of homotopy groups of the fibration Spin(m) → ESpin(m) → BSpin(m) and the fact that Spin(m) is path connected for m ≥ 2 [1]. So that only the first component of the transfer homomorphism in Lemma 3.4 is relevant.…”
Section: Spin Bundlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recall from [1] the groups Spin(n) and P in(n) that operate on R n by vector representation. We will use an octonionic representation of Clifford algebra Cl(8, 0) and refer to [10].…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that we choose indices ranging from 0 to 7. The octonionic algebra O is assumed to be given with basis {i 0 , i 1 , · · · , i 7 } obeying the multiplication table (1,4,5), (1,6,7), (2,6,4), (2,5,7), (3,4,7), (3, 5, 6)}.…”
This note provides certain computations with transfer associated with projective bundles of Spin vector bundles. One aspect is to revise the proof of the main result of [2] which says that all fourfold products of the Ray classes are zero in symplectic cobordism.Faculty of exact and natural sciences, A. Razmadze Math. Institute, Iv.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.