Clima De Segurança No Centro Cirúrgico: Atitudes Dos Profissionais De Saúde

Dezordi, Cátia Cristiane Matte; Benetti, Sabrina Azevedo Wagner; Tanaka, Ana Karina Silva da Rocha; Benetti, Eliane Raquel Rieth; Treviso, Patrícia; Carenato, Rita Catalina Aquino; Stumm, Eniva Miladi Fernandes

doi:10.5380/ce.v25i0.65577

Cited by 6 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The mean overall SAQ/OR score was 61.94, revealing that the staff perceived a neutral safety climate in the work environment. This suggests a considerable lack of initiative to improve these professionals’ perceptions of the safety climate, such as by periodical educational interventions, which are considered of prime importance to improving perceptions of safety climate [ 4 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Knowing and evaluating safety climate in the perioperatory environment is expected to yield data for a situational diagnosis, continued professional development measures, introduction of care protocols and monitoring of surgical incidents [ 9 ]. Furthermore, research allied to strategies for improving work processes can contribute to fostering better quality health services [ 4 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Data from research into safety climate and culture help guide planning and implementation of measures with a view to creating a satisfactory and propitious working environment, with motivated staff and particularly quality of care and guaranteed safety for patients and surgical team [ 4 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…There is as yet little scientific evidence of safety climate studies that apply an instrument appropriate to the surgical centre setting, making it impossible to compare by the psychometric properties of its domains [ 10 , 9 ]. Accordingly, of the various questionnaires available for measuring safety climate, this study chose the version translated, adapted and validated for the Brazilian context of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire/Operating Room (SAQ/OR), because it is specific to the surgical centre [ 4 , 9 – 11 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Safety climate in the surgical center during the Covid-19 pandemic: mixed-method study

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Context The gradual impact of the Covid-19 pandemic had important effects on routines in surgical environments. In order to cope with the impact and re-establish anaesthesiology and surgery procedures, it was imperative to pursue in-depth studies with a view to ensuring safe surgical care, reducing hazards, as well as protecting the health, safety and wellbeing of the health personnel involved. The purpose of this study was to evaluate quantitative and qualitative approaches to domains of safety climate among multi-professional staffs of surgical centres during the Covid-19 pandemic and to identify intersections. Methods This mixed-method project employed a concomitant triangulation strategy on a quantitative approach in an exploratory, descriptive, cross-sectional study, as well as a qualitative approach by way of a descriptive study. Data were collected using the validated, self-applicable Safety Attitudes Questionnaire/Operating Room (SAQ/OR) questionnaire and a semi-structured interview script. The 144 participants were the surgical, anaesthesiology, nursing and support teams working in the surgical centre during the Covid-19 pandemic. Results The study found an overall safety climate score of 61.94, the highest-scoring domain being ‘Communication in the surgical environment’ (77.91) and the lowest, ‘Perception of professional performance’ (23.60). On integrating the results, a difference was found between the domains ‘Communication in the surgical environment’ and ‘Working conditions’. However, there was intersection by the ‘Perception of professional performance’ domain, which permeated important categories of the qualitative analysis. Conclusions For care practice, it is hoped to encourage improved patient safety, educational interventions to strengthen the patient safety climate and promote in-job wellbeing on the job for health personnel working in surgical centres. It is suggested that further studies explore the subject in greater depth among several surgical centres with mixed methods, so as to permit future comparisons and to monitor the evolving maturity of safety climate.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Safety climate in the surgical center during the Covid-19 pandemic: mixed-method study

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…No cenário de especificidade cirúrgica, cumpre salientar que os indicadores de segurança do paciente são pertinentes para o gerente do CC para direcionar o planejamento e a efetivação de intervenções que proporcionem segurança tanto para o paciente como para os profissionais 24 . Dessa forma, o monitoramento das ações implantadas e implementadas deve ser um compromisso gerencial rumo à melhor qualidade e segurança 3 , também cirúrgica.…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

Clima de segurança do paciente em centro cirúrgico: avaliação pela equipe multidisciplinar

Mucelini

Matos

Silva³

et al. 2021

Rev SOBECC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objetivo: Avaliar o clima de segurança do paciente no centro cirúrgico de um hospital público de ensino, sob a ótica da equipe multidisciplinar.Método: Estudo transversal, descritivo, desenvolvido no centro cirúrgico de um hospital universitário do Paraná, Brasil. Aplicou-se a versão brasileiravalidada do Safety Attitudes Questionnaire/ Operating Room Version a uma amostra de 36 trabalhadores multidisciplinares. Na análise estatística descritiva,os escores acima de 75 pontos foram considerados positivos. Resultados: A média da percepção do clima de segurança multiprofissional foi de 61,8±38,8pontos. Apenas o Fator 8, Satisfação no trabalho (82,6±23,4), e o Fator 12, Cirurgião como coordenador da equipe (77,1±27,2), alcançaram escores positivosno estudo. O pior domínio avaliado foi “percepção de estresse” (34,2±34,1). A categoria “enfermeiro assistencial” foi a que melhor avaliou o clima desegurança do paciente, mesmo sem atingir o ponto de corte. Conclusão: O clima de segurança do paciente no centro cirúrgico obteve avaliação negativapela equipe multidisciplinar, o que indica a necessidade de revisão de processos para possível maior segurança no cuidado.

show abstract