2014
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CLImAT: accurate detection of copy number alteration and loss of heterozygosity in impure and aneuploid tumor samples using whole-genome sequencing data

Abstract: Motivation: Whole-genome sequencing of tumor samples has been demonstrated as an efficient approach for comprehensive analysis of genomic aberrations in cancer genome. Critical issues such as tumor impurity and aneuploidy, GC-content and mappability bias have been reported to complicate identification of copy number alteration and loss of heterozygosity in complex tumor samples. Therefore, efficient computational methods are required to address these issues.Results: We introduce CLImAT (CNA and LOH Assessment … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
54
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(69 reference statements)
1
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Copy number data of N SNPs is represented by read counts d 1: N , meanwhile B allele frequency is represented by B-allele read depth b 1: N and total read depth T 1: N . Following the procedures adopted in CLImAT [19], read counts are obtained by counting the reads within a 1000-bp window centered at each SNP, and further processed to correct GC-content and mappability bias. For B allele frequency, quantile normalization of read depths is automatically performed to eliminate allelic bias based on selection of optimal threshold by a grid search.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Copy number data of N SNPs is represented by read counts d 1: N , meanwhile B allele frequency is represented by B-allele read depth b 1: N and total read depth T 1: N . Following the procedures adopted in CLImAT [19], read counts are obtained by counting the reads within a 1000-bp window centered at each SNP, and further processed to correct GC-content and mappability bias. For B allele frequency, quantile normalization of read depths is automatically performed to eliminate allelic bias based on selection of optimal threshold by a grid search.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, readDepth does not output bin-level data so we could only compare our results with FREEC. A third program, CLImAT, was recently published which, among other things, infers copy number from the observed sequence depth without requiring a reference signal (Yu et al 2014). The goal of this program, however, is to use relatively deep (103 genome coverage) sequencing to obtain information that is not available from a small number of reads (0.13 genome coverage), which is the focus of our work.…”
Section: The Software Package Qdnaseqmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bao et al (2014) estimated ploidy and purity (tumor cell proportions) simultaneously using next generation sequencing data. CLImAT (Yu et al, 2014) proposed an integrated hidden Markov model (HMM) to solve the deconvolution problem using sequencing data. While these methods are successful in detecting stromal contamination, none of the above methods consider the likely common scenario where the tumor cells are composed of more than one major tumor clone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%