Climate Adaptation at the Local Scale: Using Federal Climate Adaptation Policy Regimes to Enhance Climate Services

Abstract

This paper is an interpretive reanalysis of 17 in-depth case studies of community-based climate adaptation sponsored by the Kresge Foundation between 2014–2016. Drawing from the political science and international relations literature, we use the policy regime construct to characterize U.S. federal policies and programs that drive and enable climate adaptation at the local scale. While the regime construct has been used to evaluate the international governance of climate change mitigation, it has not been used in the context of climate adaptation. We find that numerous federal policies are used by localities to pursue adaptation objectives. We find that local adaptation initiatives based on federal policy tend to be non-prescriptive, are situational in their application, utilize common policy tools, and adopt a de-centered mode of governance. While a truly sustainable and resilient society may entail fundamental “transformation”, we suggest that such a paradigm shift might be constructively cultivated through the blueprint laid out in the 17 case studies examined here—using existing know-how and tools. Based on our analysis and characterization of a federal climate adaption policy regime, we propose that the enterprise of climate services may need to move beyond existing models of co-production to embrace an ‘apprenticeship’ model, immersing technical information providers in the milieu of policy and governance in order that they might learn to recognize factors that influence the applicability, usefulness, and uptake of climate products and services.

When Do Climate Services Achieve Societal Impact? Evaluations of Actionable Climate Adaptation Science

“…Even so, stakeholders placed value on participation in these projects due to the relational benefits that they gained, such as growing their professional network and conversing with scientific experts in informal settings. Stakeholders also emphasized investigators' personal collaborative natures such as their ability to demonstrate mutual respect and humility, illustrating the importance of an investigator's willingness to take an "apprentice" role and learn from the decision makers [49].…”

“…Table 1 provides the response rate information per region, and Table 2 summarizes the demographics of respondents. All survey questions were optional to complete, so the total responses per question does not always equal the total number of complete responses (49). A public summary of the survey results is published in Bamzai-Dodson et al [42].…”

Beyond Climate Ready? A History of Seattle Public Utilities’ Ongoing Evolution from Environmental and Climate Risk Management to Integrated Sustainability

“…-As recognized elsewhere in this Special Issue [81], a hard and fast distinction between the knowledge producers and knowledge users is neither helpful nor realistic in the context of sustainability. Sustainability is always a composite of values, knowledge, natural conditions, technological capabilities and constraints, and stakeholder life experience.…”

The Role of Non-Climate Data in Equitable Climate Adaptation Planning: Lessons from Small French and American Cities

“…There are now 307 urban and rural municipalities of various sizes in France that are following this national requirement, representing about one-quarter of French municipalities, with most of them being relatively large cities [33]. Even though many of the U.S. plans have been enabled and supported by federal policies [147], they are voluntary, driven by local and state circumstances and initiatives, and are less typical for the entire nation.…”