2012
DOI: 10.2172/1040680
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Climate and Energy-Water-Land System Interactions Technical Report to the U.S. Department of Energy in Support of the National Climate Assessment

Abstract: Executive SummaryThis technical input report on climate and energy-water-land (EWL) system interactions has been prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy in support of the U.S. National Climate Assessment (NCA). Prepared on an accelerated schedule to fit the NCA's timeline, it provides a summary of existing information and understanding of this broad topic.This report provides a framework to characterize and understand the important elements of climate and EWL system interactions. It identifies many of the i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…16 That work, extended by the work reported here, then led to new considerations that were added to the 2013 National Climate Assessment (NCA), directed by the White House. The Sandia contribution (not part of this project) is noted in Wilbanks et al (2011) and Skaggs et al (2012). 17 Additionally, the international work described herein also led to Sandia being invited as an expert reviewer for the Working Group II Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report Climate Change 2013: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability 2013 of the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in the topics of: uncertainty quantification, quantified resilience, economic impacts, infrastructure, hydrology, adaptation, and emergent risks and for the regions of Arctic, North America, and Open Oceans.…”
Section: Assessing the Risk From Climate Changementioning
confidence: 85%
“…16 That work, extended by the work reported here, then led to new considerations that were added to the 2013 National Climate Assessment (NCA), directed by the White House. The Sandia contribution (not part of this project) is noted in Wilbanks et al (2011) and Skaggs et al (2012). 17 Additionally, the international work described herein also led to Sandia being invited as an expert reviewer for the Working Group II Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report Climate Change 2013: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability 2013 of the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in the topics of: uncertainty quantification, quantified resilience, economic impacts, infrastructure, hydrology, adaptation, and emergent risks and for the regions of Arctic, North America, and Open Oceans.…”
Section: Assessing the Risk From Climate Changementioning
confidence: 85%
“…• Industrial ecology: the distinction between natural resources and products (Matthews et al, 2000;Schandl et al, 2016;Weisz et al, 2015); • FEW-resource nexus: consideration of minerals and land as valuable natural resources within nexus discussions DOE, 2014); • Material flows: movements of materials in space as well as within different stages of production (Adriaanse et al, 1997;Rogich et al, 2008b;Wiedmann et al, 2015); • Technology: role of technology in linking interactions between natural resources, products, and waste streams (Skaggs et al, 2012); • LCA: material flows and contributing supply chains from generation to pollution (International Standard Organization, 2006); • System dynamics: considering impacts of component feedbacks on overall system (Karnopp et al, 1990); • Sustainability science: interactions between natural and social systems and how interactions influence overall system behavior over time (Komiyama & Takeuchi, 2006); • FEW-environment nexus: role of the environment and ecosystem services in providing quality natural resources (de Grenade et al, 2016;Rasul, 2014); • FEW-waste nexus: generation of waste in water and energy interactions as well as influence of waste on natural resources (Hülsmann & Ardakanian, 2013;Jacobson, 2009;Kurian & Ardakanian, 2016); • Circular economy: extending LCA to consider impacts and influences from pollution back to generation, including minimizing impacts through biopackaging and using waste as an input to the production process (Andersen, 2007;Witjes & Lozano, 2016; WWAP, 2017); • FEW society: consideration of social and policy dimensions of interactions (Albrecht et al, 2018); and • Socioecological-technological system: consideration of different actors (expectations and roles) within sectors (McGinnis & Ostrom, 2014).…”
Section: Rpw Cyclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is particularly relevant in the regions of high resource consumption (see Supplementary material and Fig. S6 for more on ELWC linkages) (Hoff 2011;Skaggs et al 2012;Howells et al 2013;Kraucunas et al 2014). Here, we examine the ELWC nexus in the context of India to explore the challenges in assessing the observed and projected impacts of climate change on water resources under extensive human interventions.…”
Section: Energy-land-water-climate Nexus In Indiamentioning
confidence: 99%