2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2009.02140.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Climate‐based models of spatial patterns of species richness in Egypt’s butterfly and mammal fauna

Abstract: Aim  Identifying areas of high species richness is an important goal of conservation biogeography. In this study we compared alternative methods for generating climate‐based estimates of spatial patterns of butterfly and mammal species richness. Location  Egypt. Methods  Data on the occurrence of butterflies and mammals in Egypt were taken from an electronic database compiled from museum records and the literature. Using Maxent, species distribution models were built with these data and with variables describi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
61
0
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
3
61
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in current study, among all the evaluation results from AUC, TSS and Kappa, there is no significant difference between the three evaluate methods, which interpret that the use of evaluation measures didn't interrupt the outcomes of statistical models, we can thus verified that the relationship between species characteristics and model performance was not artificial associated with use of accuracy measures (Newbold et al, 2009). However, to be more concisely evaluated the model performance, some recently studies presented one kind of global sensitivity and uncertainty analysis (GSUA) in SDMs (Convertino et al, 2014), compare with the traditional sensitivity analyses, GSUA is a robust method to globally investigate the uncertainty of SDMs and the importance of species distributions' drivers in space and time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…However, in current study, among all the evaluation results from AUC, TSS and Kappa, there is no significant difference between the three evaluate methods, which interpret that the use of evaluation measures didn't interrupt the outcomes of statistical models, we can thus verified that the relationship between species characteristics and model performance was not artificial associated with use of accuracy measures (Newbold et al, 2009). However, to be more concisely evaluated the model performance, some recently studies presented one kind of global sensitivity and uncertainty analysis (GSUA) in SDMs (Convertino et al, 2014), compare with the traditional sensitivity analyses, GSUA is a robust method to globally investigate the uncertainty of SDMs and the importance of species distributions' drivers in space and time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The species data were collected between 1829 and 2006, but most records date from the 20th Century (Newbold et al 2009). We used five environmental variables as predictors: four principal components, which describe altitude and 19 bioclimatic variables from WorldClim (Hijmans et al 2005), and a categorical land cover variable based on AVHRR satellite data (Hansen et al 2000).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the reasons discussed above (the broad knowledge of their present distributions, unequal sampling effort, gradual reduction in their ranges), Lepidoptera are good candidates for species distribution modelling (Fleishman et al, 2001;Scheingross, 2007;Newbold et al, 2009). Therefore, it seems appropriate to model the distribution of the species of Lepidoptera listed in the Habitats Directive and identify potential areas with suitable habitats for the priority species included in the Directive.…”
Section: Climatic Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%