2016
DOI: 10.1111/ele.12645
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Climate change and habitat conversion favour the same species

Abstract: Land-use change and climate change are driving a global biodiversity crisis. Yet, how species' responses to climate change are correlated with their responses to land-use change is poorly understood. Here, we assess the linkages between climate and land-use change on birds in Neotropical forest and agriculture. Across > 300 species, we show that affiliation with drier climates is associated with an ability to persist in and colonise agriculture. Further, species shift their habitat use along a precipitation gr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

4
163
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(167 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
4
163
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found interactive effects for only one diaspore species – removal rates and distances for diaspores of J. mutabilis declined with increasing aridity in less‐disturbed areas, but they increased slightly with increasing aridity in more disturbed areas. Most studies that have found interactive effects between climate variables and anthropogenic disturbance were conducted at larger spatial scales than our study (Brook et al., ; Frishkoff et al., ; Gibb et al., ). For example, Gibb et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…We found interactive effects for only one diaspore species – removal rates and distances for diaspores of J. mutabilis declined with increasing aridity in less‐disturbed areas, but they increased slightly with increasing aridity in more disturbed areas. Most studies that have found interactive effects between climate variables and anthropogenic disturbance were conducted at larger spatial scales than our study (Brook et al., ; Frishkoff et al., ; Gibb et al., ). For example, Gibb et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…4). It appears that the greater thermal tolerance of western birds might allow them to use modified landscapes to a greater degree than thermally constrained eastern birds -a finding consistent with patterns in Neotropical agricultural landscapes (Frishkoff et al 2016) -and future research should test this apparent link, perhaps through the measurement of thermal stress. Moreover, these differences correlated with the degree of annual temperature variation in the environment and with community-level differences in thermal sensitivity across regions (Srinivasan et al 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The adaptation of species to locally prevalent environmental conditions is likely to influence their sensitivity to land-use change, because habitat modification alters the abiotic environment, especially the thermal environment. Indeed, birds adapted to dry Neotropical forests have been found to be more tolerant of the conversion of forest to agriculture (Frishkoff et al 2016, Karp et al 2018, and low thermal tolerances in reptiles and amphibians are associated with greater sensitivity to habitat change (Frishkoff et al 2015). Further, forest canopies buffer the understorey against thermal extremes, leading to lower temperature variation within forests than in anthropogenically modified habitats (DeFrenne et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Key drivers of population declines include climate change and conversion of natural habitat to anthropogenic land uses, both of which have had major impacts on biological systems (Newbold et al., ; Rosenzweig et al., ) and are widely thought to be global threats to biodiversity (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, ; Thomas et al., ). The response of animal populations to these rapid environmental changes has not been consistent: some populations have experienced increasing abundance and expanding distributions; conversely, other populations have suffered shrinking abundances and distributions (Frishkoff et al., ; La Marca et al., ; Thomas, Franco, & Hill, ). Declines in animal populations result in an erosion of ecosystem function and loss of ecosystem services (Ehrlich & Daily, ; Parmesan & Yohe, ; Thomas et al., ; Winfree, Fox, Williams, Reilly, & Cariveau, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%