Climate change and trade policy: from legal complications to time factor

Abstract

Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to analyze the legal complications prevail towards the architecture of mutual policy design between trade and climate change regimes. The recent literature on this topic is mainly focused on commons and has significantly ignored the existing regulatory constraints between both the regimes. Therefore, in this study relevant WTO and environmental laws are critically examined in order to bring another side of literally work on trade-climate policy framework. Moreover, the time factor, role of developing countries and two approaches are also discussed that are important constituents to be considered during ongoing climate change multilateral talks. Design/methodology/approach -This paper has six parts in total. Part one comprises of "Introduction", part two gives "Overview of relevant WTO and climate change regulations", part three describes "Antithesis of WTO and climate change rules" and explains the differences that both regimes posses in the basics of their nature, part four enumerates that how to galvanize the anticipated disputes among both the regimes, part five is focused on the participation of developing countries and their possible reservations towards climate policy and, part six gives some concluding remarks. Findings -This study found four major points of caution while architecting climate change policy. First, the climate change policy gives excuse to certain economies to protect their domestic industry, which is supposedly the violation of WTO rules. Second, the disputes arise at WTO platform from the climate friendly trade policies would be a new inconvincible challenge. Third, the GATT article XX (general exceptions) and agreement on subsidies and countervailing measures (ASCM) are still not clearly defined under climate change regime. Fourth, the position of least developed countries (LDCs), there is no action plan as these countries are the most affected due to possible stringent trade-climate policies.Research limitations/implications -This research posses potential policy implication for both governments and international organizations, and provides new direction to trade and climate change researchers. It opens the way to critically examine the legal issues addressed in this paper which subsequently help both trade climate change regimes to overcome such regulatory differences with mutual consensus. Practical implications -As policy implication this study suggests that what has been achieved during last two decades over climate change issue, and how long would it take to achieve the reasonable targets? In-fact, the past work has succeeded to address the climate change as the global issue and it needs to be solved jointly but there is still a long way to make potential progress in order to architect the comprehensive policy and designing of multilateral agreements. It needs more time to constitute a climate change regime free from individual countries' political and economical interests and consensus amongst all major countries and group. Originality/value -...

Preventing carbon emission retaliatory rebound post-COVID-19 requires expanding free trade and improving energy efficiency

“…Trade openness helped more underdeveloped economies to improve the national economic level and get rid of poverty. But the environmental pollution associated with this economic boom cannot be ignored ( Ahmed and Long, 2013 ). Consequently, more scholars invested in investigating the correlation between trade and environmental degradation.…”

The linkages between deforestation, energy and growth for environmental degradation in Pakistan

“…The rapid occurrence of natural calamities i.e., floods, hurricanes, earthquakes, tsunamis, etc., further deteriorate the environment and cause widespread destruction. This rapidly changing global environmental trend has also captured the attention of the international research community (Ahmed and Long, 2013b). In recent years, environmental research is one of the most discussed topics among both physical and social scientists.…”

Trade openness–carbon emissions nexus: The importance of turning points of trade openness for country panels

“…It is projected that advanced countries will limit trade with lower income countries in order to control carbon leakages as a result of the widening deadlock. As discussed by Messerlin, (2010) and Ahmed and Long (2013), trade and climate change policies are interdependent and the trade-climate policies will either suffer from mutual destruction or mutual construction due to varying global externality effects. Consequently, unilateral measures towards trade restrictions from advanced economies to emerging economies would result in a division in the global economies where they will be cleaner and dirty production heavens and hells in these countries.…”

“…The huge expansion in the world merchandise trade gives rise to more production and more establishment of structures and industrial units. This wide expansion in world aggregate output necessitates greater energy resources, which is considered the potential source of carbon dioxide (CO 2 The most worrying thing at this stage is the conflicting situation between trade and climate economists. The policy deadlock between high and low income countries is widening as trade talks suffer more failures.…”