2011
DOI: 10.1080/09644016.2011.617175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Climate change and water policy in Australia's irrigation areas: a lost opportunity for a partnership model of governance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because while mitigation was framed as a global challenge, adaptation (which is more closely related to water) was defined as a local challenge in the Climate Convention (Bodansky, 1993). This was done to reduce rich countries' liabilities in relation to adaptation (Gupta, 2014a), and water users and the perceived impacts of use are primarily local (Alston & Whittenbury, 2011). This arguably led to water's receiving significantly less attention within the climate change regime and groundwater receiving only a small share of the attention within that.…”
Section: Discursive Normative and Substantive Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because while mitigation was framed as a global challenge, adaptation (which is more closely related to water) was defined as a local challenge in the Climate Convention (Bodansky, 1993). This was done to reduce rich countries' liabilities in relation to adaptation (Gupta, 2014a), and water users and the perceived impacts of use are primarily local (Alston & Whittenbury, 2011). This arguably led to water's receiving significantly less attention within the climate change regime and groundwater receiving only a small share of the attention within that.…”
Section: Discursive Normative and Substantive Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Community involvement, while important, is insufficient to address systemic problems; however, community engagement models that aim to mobilise and motivate people can be meaningfully applied to climatechange adaptation (Wiseman et al 2011) Studying social responses to major water reform, Alston and Whittenbury (2011) argue that the commitment to devolution and participation are critical to the success of reforms and they define the over-arching need as one of establishing functional meta-governance arrangements. The recommendations of Dovers (2001) for institutional redesign and the proposed principles for NRM governance are also calls for reforms that support more functional metagovernance arrangements.…”
Section: Devolved Participatory Approaches and Community Involvementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Successful natural resources reforms rely on much more than the skilful selection of policy instruments because the implementation of major policy reforms has the potential for significant transitional impacts on communities, and policy development and implementation are generally improved by active participation of the affected communities, so they are involved in the co-creation of the future (Alston and Whittenbury 2011). Community involvement, while important, is insufficient to address systemic problems; however, community engagement models that aim to mobilise and motivate people can be meaningfully applied to climatechange adaptation (Wiseman et al 2011) Studying social responses to major water reform, Alston and Whittenbury (2011) argue that the commitment to devolution and participation are critical to the success of reforms and they define the over-arching need as one of establishing functional meta-governance arrangements.…”
Section: Devolved Participatory Approaches and Community Involvementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations