2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2012.02034.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Climate change exacerbates interspecific interactions in sympatric coastal fishes

Abstract: Summary1. Biological responses to warming are presently based on the assumption that species will remain within their bioclimatic envelope as environmental conditions change. As a result, changes in the relative abundance of several marine species have been documented over the last decades. This suggests that warming may drive novel interspecific interactions to occur (i.e. invasive vs. native species) or may intensify the strength of pre-existing ones (i.e. warm vs. cold adapted). For mobile species, habitat … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
119
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
119
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Habitat considered to be suitable in rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org Proc R Soc B 280: 20132495 the future could be limited based on pressure from competitors or predators [43,44]. Furthermore, population declines or increases owing to changing habitat suitability could be accelerated in the presence of competition and predation [45,46]. Our results also suggest a less obvious effect of biotic interactions, whereby competition alters range-wide speciesenvironment relationships; this type of effect will also alter future range shifts and distribution patterns of species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Habitat considered to be suitable in rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org Proc R Soc B 280: 20132495 the future could be limited based on pressure from competitors or predators [43,44]. Furthermore, population declines or increases owing to changing habitat suitability could be accelerated in the presence of competition and predation [45,46]. Our results also suggest a less obvious effect of biotic interactions, whereby competition alters range-wide speciesenvironment relationships; this type of effect will also alter future range shifts and distribution patterns of species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While numerous studies have provided evidence of changing competitive interactions in response to climate change [10,21,22], it is more difficult to identify how climatic warming affects the overall importance of competition for shaping communities [23]. In general, changes in the intensity of interspecific competition under climate change are likely to be driven by several distinct, but sometimes synergistic, processes: first, changes in the extent and diversity of favourable habitats may alter patterns of competition for remaining space and resources [10,24 -27].…”
Section: Climate Change and Competitive Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potentially equally or more important to future community diversity are effects of warming on changes in the outcomes of competitive interactions, but these have received much less attention to date. Like trophic interactions, competitive interactions may intensify or diminish under climate change [9,10], with important consequences for local biodiversity and ecosystem services.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Defi nitions of the categories of main individual activities are defi ned based on the work of Fulton and Bellwood (2002) and Milazzo et al (2013).…”
Section: Sedentarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observer was trained to estimate individual sizes with a database of screenshots of plastic fi sh silhouettes of different colours (bright and dark ones), known sizes (0.2 m, 0.4 m, 0.6 m, 0.8 m, and 1 m) and known distances from the same camera (2 m, 5 m, 7 m, and 10 m) (Mallet et al 2014). In addition, the behaviour of each individual of C. julis and D. vulgaris was analysed according to the behavioural categories defi ned in Table 2, based on defi nitions of quantifi cation of fi sh behaviour in Fulton and Bellwood (2002) and Milazzo et al (2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%