2005
DOI: 10.5558/tfc81683-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Climate change implications for stand yields and soil expectation values: A northern Saskatchewan case study

Abstract: We explore the effects of climate change on future stand yields and future area burned, and integrate these to determine future Soil Expectation Values (SEV) for white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss) in central Saskatchewan. The results suggest that under most future scenarios, stand productivity increases, but decreases under extreme drought. However, projected increases in area burned offset these productivity increases. Under high levels of future area burned, SEV is lower than current values, resulting… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the wood that will be harvested in Canada over the next 50 to 100 years will come from trees that are already growing or will be planted in the next decade with minimal climate change adaptation considerations. In some areas there will be an increase in forest productivity while in other areas there will be a decrease (Spittlehouse 2003, Hogg and Bernier 2005, Johnson and Williamson 2005. What will this mean for rotation ages, wood quality, wood volume, size of logs and determining the annual allowable cut?…”
Section: Adapting To Climate Change In Forestry -Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most of the wood that will be harvested in Canada over the next 50 to 100 years will come from trees that are already growing or will be planted in the next decade with minimal climate change adaptation considerations. In some areas there will be an increase in forest productivity while in other areas there will be a decrease (Spittlehouse 2003, Hogg and Bernier 2005, Johnson and Williamson 2005. What will this mean for rotation ages, wood quality, wood volume, size of logs and determining the annual allowable cut?…”
Section: Adapting To Climate Change In Forestry -Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These changes would significantly affect forest ecosystems and their utilization by society. Predicted changes include the movement of species ranges northward and up in elevation, new assemblages of species occurring in space and time, and changes in disturbance regimes, forest productivity and water resources (Stewart et al 1998, Kirschbaum 2000, Dale et al 2001, Mote et al 2003, Gray 2005, Hogg and Bernier 2005, Johnson and Williamson 2005, Volney and Hirsch 2005. Forest management decisions are usually based on the assumption that the climate remains relatively stable throughout a forest's life.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This should allow them to be better able to develop forest management practices that are more robust to a range of possible changes in future moisture conditions for inclusion in long-term forest management plans. For example, observed and projected trends in CMI and PDSI indices can be used as "early warning" indicators of potential future impacts such as changes in tree mortality due to drought Bernier 2005, Michaelian et al 2011), changes in forest pest activity due to decreased tree resistance (Safranyik 2011), changes in the frequency and severity of forest fires due to changes in moisture levels of fuels and surface litter (de Groot et al 2013), changes in the percentage of reforested sites that reach free-to-grow status, and changes in site productivity and forest land values (Johnston and Williamson 2005). In the future, other drought indices may also be developed to assess and project changes in moisture conditions in Canadian boreal forests.…”
Section: Potential Implications For Forest Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understanding the potential impacts of climate change on forest productivity is useful for incorporating climate change into forest management plan and silvicultural decision-making process. Currently, the annual allowable cut and rotation age are determined by empirical growth and yield models based on historical data, which do not and cannot respond to current or future climate scenarios (Johnson & Williamson 2005). Empirical models with a climate-sensitive site index as an important driving variable could project future growth and yield under climate change, thus providing forest managers with a useful tool for adapting their plans.…”
Section: Implications For Forest Management Planning Of Larch Plantatmentioning
confidence: 99%