Climate Change in Queensland's Grazing Lands: Ii. An Assessment of the Impact on Animal Production From Native Pastures.

Abstract

The 160 million ha of grazing land in Queensland support approximately 10 million beef equivalents (9.8 million cattle and 10.7 million sheep) with treed and cleared native pastures as the major forage source. The complexity of these biophysical systems and their interaction with pasture and stock management, economic and social forces limits our ability to easily calculate the impact of climate change scenarios. We report the application of a systems approach in simulating the flow of plant dry matter and utilisation of forage by animals. Our review of available models highlighted the lack of suitable mechanistic models and the potential role of simple empirical relationships of utilisation and animal production derived from climatic and soil indices. Plausible climate change scenarios were evaluated by using a factorial of rainfall (f 10%) * 3260C temperature increase * doubling CO, in sensitivity studies at property, regional and State scales. Simulation of beef cattle liveweight gain at three locations in the Queensland black speargrass zone showed that a *lo% change in rainfall was magnified to be a f 15% change in animal production (liveweight gain per ha) depending on location, temperature and CO, change. Models of 'safe' carrying capacity were developed from property data and expert opinion. Climate change impacts on 'safe' carrying capacity varied considerably across the State depending on whether moisture, temperature or nutrients were the limiting factors. Without the effect of doubling CO,, warmer temperatures and +lo% changes in rainfall resulted in -35 to +70% changes in 'safe' carrying capacity depending on location. With the effect of doubling CO, included, the changes in 'safe' carrying capacity ranged from -12 to +115% across scenarios and locations. When aggregated to a whole-of-State carrying capacity, the combined effects of warmer temperature, doubling CO, and +lo% changes in rainfall resulted in 'safe' carrying capacity changes of +3 to +45% depending on rainfall scenario and location. A major finding of the sensitivity study was the potential importance of doubling CO, in mitigating or amplifying the effects of warmer temperatures and changes in rainfall. Field studies on the impact of CO, are therefore a high research priority. Keywords: climate change, Queensland, simulation, rangelands, beef production, cattle, carrying capacity, CO,, utilisation

Impact of global warming on beef cattle production cost in Brazil

“…Similar results were obtained by Hall et al (1998) using simulation of beef cattle liveweight gain at three locations of Australia. The authors found that ± 10% change in rainfall was magnified to be ± 15% change in animal production (liveweight gain per ha), depending on location and temperature change, and climate change impacts on pasture capacity/risk varied considerably depending on moisture, temperature or soil nutrients.…”

Prediction of mortality and conception rates of beef breeding cattle in northern Australia

“…Regardless of the criterion chosen for optimisation (usually economics or profitability), all management decisions interact with climatic and other natural features of each dynamic system (Mayer et al 1998). The only realistic method of investigating these interactions is with simulation models that encompass the whole system, from rainfall and soils, to pasture production and animal intake (McKeon et al 1990;Hall et al 1998), herd dynamics, and through to the economics of animals turned off .…”

Climate Change Effects on Livestock Feed Resources: A Review

“…The changes in seasonal patterns of forage availability could pose additional challenges for grazing management in the rangeland. Similarly, the climates become hotter and drier; pasture composition is likely to shift to species that may be less suitable for grazing [14]. Climate change has observed to affect rangeland species richness and biodiversity.…”