2015
DOI: 10.1080/10572252.2015.1001296
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Climate Change Research Across Disciplines: The Value and Uses of Multidisciplinary Research Reviews for Technical Communication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These Facebook pages act as echo chambers, and, as studies suggest, few members of these groups would likely be open to persuasion on climate change based purely on scientific information (Cagle & Tillery, 2015). But, this study points out a larger danger than the existence of an inclusive, extremist community by noting the circulation of misrepresentations and threats on these fora.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…These Facebook pages act as echo chambers, and, as studies suggest, few members of these groups would likely be open to persuasion on climate change based purely on scientific information (Cagle & Tillery, 2015). But, this study points out a larger danger than the existence of an inclusive, extremist community by noting the circulation of misrepresentations and threats on these fora.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…In particular research carried out in environmental communication and rhetoric, a vibrant research field with a well established literature that we can only mention here, provides first promising results (e.g. special issue Environmental Communication 7 2013; Cagle and Tillery ; Pearce et al . ; Walsh ).…”
Section: Three Theses For Furthering Interdisciplinary Inquiry Into Gmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Tackling a complicated, “wicked” problem such as climate change requires interdisciplinary approaches (Cagle & Tillery, 2015, p. 147). This inquiry meets these challenges by combining quantitative discourse analysis using Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) software (Pennebaker, Booth et al, 2015) and rhetorical analysis based on Kenneth Burke’s theories of identification and consubstantiality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%