2020
DOI: 10.3390/su12197990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Climate Change Risk Perceptions of Audiences in the Climate Change Blogosphere

Abstract: The Climate Change Risk Perception Model (CCRPM, Van der Linden, 2015) has been used to characterize public risk perceptions; however, little is known about the model’s explanatory power in other (online) contexts. In this study, we extend the model and investigate the risk perceptions of a unique audience: The polarized climate change blogosphere. In total, our model explained 84% of the variance in risk perceptions by integrating socio-demographic characteristics, cognitive factors, experiential processes, s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, several communication channels can function efficiently only when they provide coherent information; otherwise, a kind of information noise may appear (this is harmful to reputation of corporations, as well as to clarity of behavior norms to their workers). The highly-complex response of the audience to the climate-related information (e.g., [39]) indicates on potential danger of the noted noise. Another important issue is linked to the industry-scale climate-friendly actions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, several communication channels can function efficiently only when they provide coherent information; otherwise, a kind of information noise may appear (this is harmful to reputation of corporations, as well as to clarity of behavior norms to their workers). The highly-complex response of the audience to the climate-related information (e.g., [39]) indicates on potential danger of the noted noise. Another important issue is linked to the industry-scale climate-friendly actions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other findings included that publics wished scientists to be concerned for humanity and the environment in their communication (17) and advocate for climate change, working closely with policymakers (9). Trust in scientists was found to regulate the acceptance of messages about climate change (29), to mediate the effect of climate-related information on publics (35), to influence the public's climate change risk perception (54), and to promote climate-friendly behaviours (8,22). The media outlet for the communication of scientific messages and the identity of the communicator were also found to impact public trust (5,28,41,46,51,57).…”
Section: Main Findings On Public Trust In Climate Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Asia, the most important indicator of risk perception of climate change impacts is local temperature change [25,26], whereas globally, climate change awareness is determined by educational attainment [25]. Furthermore, personal experiences of other extreme weather events and impacts of climate change also influence climate change risk perceptions [27][28][29], as well as socio-demographic characteristics which include gender, income [25,26], age [30], and geographical location [31,32]; and occupation [26]. However, studies on climate change awareness and risk perceptions of climate change impacts on the coastal marine ecosystem, particularly in Palawan, are less explored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%