2021
DOI: 10.3390/g12020045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Climate Change Sustainability: From Bargaining to Cooperative Balanced Approach

Abstract: This work aims to provide different perspectives on the relationships between cooperative game theory and the research field concerning climate change dynamics. New results are obtained in the framework of competitive bargaining solutions and related issues, moving from a cooperative approach to a competitive one. Furthermore, the dynamics of balanced and super-balanced games are exposed, with particular reference to coalitions. Some open problems are presented to aid future research in this area.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fourth, from the perspective of the relationship between cooperative game theory and the field of climate change dynamics, Ciano et al provided a set of competitive negotiations and unified competitive solutions for cooperative games [37]. They analyzed balanced and super-balanced games from two central results related to cooperative game methods, and their model provides a theoretical basis for our research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fourth, from the perspective of the relationship between cooperative game theory and the field of climate change dynamics, Ciano et al provided a set of competitive negotiations and unified competitive solutions for cooperative games [37]. They analyzed balanced and super-balanced games from two central results related to cooperative game methods, and their model provides a theoretical basis for our research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on Equations ( 9) and ( 10), the allocations in the core meet not only the individual rationality, but also the alliance rationality; that is, the income of any alliance is not less than the income it can obtain independently from the allocations in the core [37].…”
Section: Cooperative Game Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The competition between the players makes cooperation unlikely, especially due to the zero-sum nature of the game. Therefore, the approach falls into the realm of non-cooperative game theory [24] and joins game-theoretic studies of climate negotiations [25][26][27][28]. Further, there are plenty of approaches that solve the core problem of a prisoner's dilemma and provision of public goods by voluntary contributions [29,30].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%