2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-04506-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Climate co-benefits of alternate strategies for tourist transportation: The case of Murree Hills in Pakistan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of research scope, it is carried out from the perspectives of the country [ 12 ], provinces [ 13 ], cities [ 14 ], and scenic spots [ 15 ]. In terms of research content, it mainly involves three parts: tourism transportation [ 16 ], tourism accommodation [ 17 ] and tourism activities [ 18 ]. In contrast, there are relatively few studies on tourism carbon emissions using the “top-down” approach.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of research scope, it is carried out from the perspectives of the country [ 12 ], provinces [ 13 ], cities [ 14 ], and scenic spots [ 15 ]. In terms of research content, it mainly involves three parts: tourism transportation [ 16 ], tourism accommodation [ 17 ] and tourism activities [ 18 ]. In contrast, there are relatively few studies on tourism carbon emissions using the “top-down” approach.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main strength of this method is that it can be applied to more than two factors and it would give a perfect decomposition; it creates a link between the multiplicative and additive decomposition, thereby giving estimates of an effect on the sub group level [35][36][37][38]. In recent years, this approach has been applied at various levels, both national and sub regional [27,39] such as in China [40,41], Latin America [42], the United States [30], Iran [43], India [44], Pakistan [45], Philippines [46], the European Union [47], Greece [48], Spain [49], Ireland [50], South Korea [51], United Kingdom [52], Brazil [53], and Turkey [54].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming identical fleet structure and exhaust tailpipe control technologies, annual average emissions of CO, HC, NO x , and CO 2 could reach 12,780, 14,799, 10,322, and 424,218 metric tons, respectively, in the lower-altitude sector (540–1940 m above sea level); 10,780, 12,016, 8,585, and 489,212 metric tons, respectively, at intermediate high altitudes (1940–3293 m above sea level); and 3,718, 3,940, 3,289, and 141,585 metric tons, respectively, at the highest altitudes (3293–4693 m above sea level) after the completion of the CPEC, representing a serious environmental threat. Applying the 20- and 100-year global warming potential calculations from the previous studies [ 41 , 42 ] (see Table S5 ), total CO 2 -equivalent emissions on the CPEC portion between Islamabad and the Khunjerab Pass could represent 2,173,142 and 1,731,079 metric tons. Moreover, considering the geographical proximity of the Tibetan Plateau, further analysis of simultaneous emissions from pollutants and greenhouse gases along the CPEC in Pakistan should be conducted to quantify the impact of freight transport by trucks on air quality and climate and to evaluate potential mitigation policies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%