Climate Crisis and the Actuarial Imaginary: 'The War on Global Warming'

Abstract

Has there ever been a climate crisis? Or an economic crisis? Did these ever happen? Are they happening? 'Merry crisis and a happy new fear' -these words, spray painted outside the Bank of Greece in Athens, as that country erupted in riots in December 2008, seemed to say it so well. There is always another crisis, a new crisis. Enjoy your crisis. But also be scared. Since the crisis perpetuates fear. In this paper we want to critically interrogate the proposition that we live in a time of crisis. What is politically at stake in such claims, as rife as they seem to have become? How do they fold into processes of subjection and subjectivation, shaping our roles as citizens, workers, migrants, consumers, activists or investors? How does the declaration of a crisis amplify, modify or detract from the underlying conditions to which it seeks to draw attention? We ask these questions not simply because we are suspicious of the terminology that circulates in venues like The Economist or Time Magazine. Our investigation is also driven by the belief that the construction, interpretation and management of the present as a time of crisis locates individuals and populations as objects of particular strategies of governance. While we explore these strategies predominantly in relation to the discourses and practices surrounding the notion of climate crisis, we do not limit our analysis to this object or even understand the term 'climate' in an exclusively meteorological sense.To approach climate crisis as a construct is not to do the same as regards the warming of the earth's atmosphere or the depletion of the resources that have fuelled the development of global modernity. Indeed, it is the seriousness of this situation that motivates our inquiry and leads us to ask what is at stake in the invocation of crisis, or perhaps better, yet another crisis. To invoke the notion of crisis is to construct a particular injunction to judgement and action that establishes in itself the imperative for redressing that crisis. In crisis, as it is popularly noted, we find ourselves in a moment of danger and opportunity. Unsurprisingly, much of the current discourse on climate change oscillates between these two poles: most dramatically, between imminent catastrophe and the prospect of renewal; between unimaginable humanitarian disaster and the promise of a green-tech revolution. As such the climate crisis regularly calls forth regimes of risk, since it is notions of risk that work this line between danger and opportunity, between protection and profit.This essay's premise, that climate crisis shapes particular subjectivities, is built on the presupposition of the existence of a political economy of protection and profit that constitutes, as it constructs, that crisis. To interrogate the processes of subjection and subjectivation integral to this economy, the essay traces how the climate crisis becomes enfolded in existing logics that seek to manage contingency through risk; significantly, via those risk logics of security and securitisation by ...

Mapping the catastrophic imaginary: The organisation of environmental politics through climate change

“…Environmental imaginaries have been examined as collective visions of environmental and climate crisis as well as constructive or sustainable responses (Dibley and Neilson, 2010; Jessop, 2010; Levy and Spicer, 2013; Milkoreit, 2017; Swyngedouw, 2011, 2013). However, while imaginaries are constantly in motion and production, and themselves are contested terrains (Jessop, 2010: 345–346; Levy and Spicer, 2013), imaginaries form frameworks within which social action is enabled and ascribed meaning.…”

Climates of democracy: Skeptical, rational, and radical imaginaries

“…Scholars have attended to political imaginaries to fill gaps in the traditional accounts of political science and political sociology (Browne & Diehl, 2019, p. 393). They have studied imaginaries in order to understand different social responses and collective visions of environmental crisis and the possibilities for sustainability and energy transformations (Dibley & Neilson, 2010; Jessop, 2012; Levy & Spicer, 2013; Milkoreit, 2017; Swyngedouw, 2010, 2018; Tozer & Klenk, 2018). Some of this work suggests that mainstream climate politics, dominated by Eurocentric imaginaries with assumptions of linear technological progress, can potentially be disrupted by the imaginaries of “othered” regions and indigenous peoples; such imaginaries offer valuable understandings of temporality; of human and non‐human life (Death, 2022, p. 246); of territory (Thompson & Ban, 2022); of crises (Whyte, 2018); and of sociopolitical organization (Steinberg et al, 2015, p. 8).…”