2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.11.089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Climate impacts on hydropower and consequences for global electricity supply investment needs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
73
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
73
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We have expanded upon previous estimates of water scarcity drivers by quantifying how the coevolution of a dynamic socioeconomic system and changing climate system may alter water scarcity into the future. This has been done by using evolving and differing socioeconomic assumptions that account for changes across all sectors , Graham et al 2018, in combination with considerations for climate impacts to water availability, hydropower expansion (Turner et al 2017), agricultural productivity changes (Rosenzweig et al 2014), and building energy expenditures (Clarke et al 2018). The use of these socioeconomic and climate assumptions in GCAM allow for feedback linkages between these systems, enabling price adjustments and resultant demand changes across sectors when supplies become increasingly depleted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have expanded upon previous estimates of water scarcity drivers by quantifying how the coevolution of a dynamic socioeconomic system and changing climate system may alter water scarcity into the future. This has been done by using evolving and differing socioeconomic assumptions that account for changes across all sectors , Graham et al 2018, in combination with considerations for climate impacts to water availability, hydropower expansion (Turner et al 2017), agricultural productivity changes (Rosenzweig et al 2014), and building energy expenditures (Clarke et al 2018). The use of these socioeconomic and climate assumptions in GCAM allow for feedback linkages between these systems, enabling price adjustments and resultant demand changes across sectors when supplies become increasingly depleted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Europe in general, this results in a total decrease of approximately −5% under the RCP 2.6 scenario and up to −20% under the RCP 8.5 scenario by 2080 [10]. Another study by Turner et al [24] finds a change in net global hydropower production by −8% to −5% under RCP 8.5 and between −4% and +4% under RCP 4.5 by the end of this century.…”
Section: Climate Change and Water Availabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on their global simulation, Turner et al [24] expect a decrease in Swiss hydro generation of −7.1% on average in 2050, ranging from −9.1 to −1.3% depending on the underlying emission scenario and GCM. Austria (−13.7%) is even more severely affected by projected climate change.…”
Section: Climate Change and Water Availabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally the analysis in this paper does not cast a wide enough net to capture the expected benefits of climate change mitigation in terms of the avoided impacts on water resources and consequently the performance of energy technologies that rely on water availability. Significant geographic diversity is anticipated, and impacts may be partially mitigated when aggregated across regions and globally [61,62]. Nonetheless, avoiding adaptation costs in the 1.5°C scenarios is expected to improve synergies with the SDG6 targets in many regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%