2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00382-017-3570-8
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Climate modeling over the Mediterranean Sea: impact of resolution and ocean coupling

Abstract: introduced a warm SST bias in winter. Radiation fluxes were slightly better represented in coarse-grid simulations. Still, only the higher-resolution coupled simulations could reproduce the observed net outgoing total heat flux over the Mediterranean Sea. Investigation of the impact of subdiurnal SST variations showed a strong effect on sub-daily heat fluxes and wind speed but minor effects at longer time scales. Therefore, a coupled atmosphere-ocean climate model should be preferred for studying the Mediterra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
61
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
4
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, at higher resolutions the representation of air-sea interaction also improves (e.g. Akhtar et al 2018;Roberts et al 2016;Hewitt et al 2017). At the same time, our results indicate an intensification of MHWs in the Mediterranean Sea with time, in agreement with the results obtained by Oliver et al (2018a) and , which used different MHW definitions.…”
Section: Model Uncertaintysupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Indeed, at higher resolutions the representation of air-sea interaction also improves (e.g. Akhtar et al 2018;Roberts et al 2016;Hewitt et al 2017). At the same time, our results indicate an intensification of MHWs in the Mediterranean Sea with time, in agreement with the results obtained by Oliver et al (2018a) and , which used different MHW definitions.…”
Section: Model Uncertaintysupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Furthermore, high-resolution models show smaller biases than the coarser simulations, but a similar pattern in the biases (Obermann et al, 2016a). Increasing the model resolution improves the representation of wind speeds in the Mediterranean region (Ruti et al, 2008;Herrmann et al, 2011) and enhances the quality of coupled simulations (Akhtar et al, 2017). Increasing the model resolution improves the representation of wind speeds in the Mediterranean region (Ruti et al, 2008;Herrmann et al, 2011) and enhances the quality of coupled simulations (Akhtar et al, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Changes in sea surface roughness parameterization showed an impact on wind speed and wind direction during mistral events (Obermann et al, 2016b). Increasing the model resolution improves the representation of wind speeds in the Mediterranean region (Ruti et al, 2008;Herrmann et al, 2011) and enhances the quality of coupled simulations (Akhtar et al, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, RCMs allow the climate processes to be assessed, the impacts of climate change to be projected, 27 and also help decision makers to come to conclusions. 5,26 In the context of regional climate modeling, some points have been discussed: (1) the quality of the RCM simulations is dependent on the quality of the GCM outputs that provide the lateral boundary conditions-Giorgi and Mearns 2 describe it as "garbage in, garbage out"; (2) the sensitivity of the RCMs determines the size of the domain and the horizontal resolution; 28,29 (3) the confidence of the models that are evaluated through comparisons with observations; (4) the added value compared with the GCMs, 6,[30][31][32][33] and (5) bias correction. [34][35][36] Some of these points will be emphasized below.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%