DOI: 10.3384/diss.diva-143226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Climate vulnerability assessment methodology: Agriculture under climate change in the Nordic region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 145 publications
(392 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One significant example of the problems faced here is the planned reduction of the size of Ecological Focus Areas (EFA) from their current 15 ha. This became necessary because in some countries, e.g., Romania, the average farm size is below 15 ha, a fact that exempts them from the intended incentive and therefore renders the EFA conditionality inefficient (Wiréhn, 2017;Zinngrebe et al, 2017). Although protection is still a good measure, the EU-Nature restoration plan advocates restoration as being the most plausible way to align the interests of agriculture with the preservation of nature (EC, 2020b).…”
Section: Agricultural Biodiversity Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One significant example of the problems faced here is the planned reduction of the size of Ecological Focus Areas (EFA) from their current 15 ha. This became necessary because in some countries, e.g., Romania, the average farm size is below 15 ha, a fact that exempts them from the intended incentive and therefore renders the EFA conditionality inefficient (Wiréhn, 2017;Zinngrebe et al, 2017). Although protection is still a good measure, the EU-Nature restoration plan advocates restoration as being the most plausible way to align the interests of agriculture with the preservation of nature (EC, 2020b).…”
Section: Agricultural Biodiversity Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%