2015
DOI: 10.3390/rel6020742
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Climate Weirding and Queering Nature: Getting Beyond the Anthropocene

Abstract: Though many scientists and scholars of the environmental humanities are referring to the current geological era as the anthropocene, this article argues that there are some problems with this trope and the narrative that emerges from it. First, responsibility for the current era of climate weirding is not shared equally, some humans are way more responsible than others. Second, the claim of the anthropocene works rhetorically to maintain a sense of human exceptionalism from the rest of the evolution of life on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it has been argued that this erosion, rather than eroding the distinction, centralises the role of humans and simultaneously absorbs nature into culture (Crist, 2013). This anthropocentrism only perpetuates the idea that humans can manage (natural) environments and, as a result, is not dissimilar to the logic that arguably led to environmental crises in the first place (Crist, 2013; Bauman, 2015).…”
Section: Ecofeminism: Insights and Inroadsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it has been argued that this erosion, rather than eroding the distinction, centralises the role of humans and simultaneously absorbs nature into culture (Crist, 2013). This anthropocentrism only perpetuates the idea that humans can manage (natural) environments and, as a result, is not dissimilar to the logic that arguably led to environmental crises in the first place (Crist, 2013; Bauman, 2015).…”
Section: Ecofeminism: Insights and Inroadsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This notion provided an impetus, to scholarly and militant milieus alike, to go beyond a binary categorization and deconstruct the notion of gender in order to avoid confining criticism to the opposition between men-women on the one hand and gays-lesbians on the other. In the realm of ecological critics, "queer" has nonetheless added to the multiplicity of voices, be they human or not, from the Global South or not, that are stuck and are victims, in a non-normative and anti-essentialist manner, of what is often referred to as the Anthropocene (Bauman 2015;Tola 2018). We shall see to what extent the term "queer" does this when it appears in the field of ecological discourses we have observed and analyzed, especially regarding seemingly essentialist and constructivist stances.…”
Section: Theoretical Considerations: the Entanglement Between Gender ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Mercer reflects on the etymology of witnessing (martyria) as "both accompaniment and acknowledgment" as the practice that "can produce the possibility of change" (Mercer 2017, p. 288). Lastly, Keller aims to reclaim eschatological hope from the strictures of "a nature-transcending and patriarchal God" (Keller 2015, p. 11) and insists on the not-yet-known possibilities that arise from relating with others, which she calls "apophatic entanglement" (Keller 2014, p. 7; see also Bauman 2015).…”
Section: Eschatology Nowmentioning
confidence: 99%