1985
DOI: 10.2151/jmsj1965.63.6_1157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Climatic Jump: A Hypothesis in Climate Diagnosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering that in some cases the MK test failed to yield step change point for a time series (Yamamoto et al, 1985), the MTT and Yamamoto methods were further employed in the same data sets of PCBs and OCPs at the four arctic monitoring sites to verify the MK test results and to increase the confidence of detected step change points by the MK test. Figures …”
Section: Step Change Points Identified By Mtt and Yamamoto Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Considering that in some cases the MK test failed to yield step change point for a time series (Yamamoto et al, 1985), the MTT and Yamamoto methods were further employed in the same data sets of PCBs and OCPs at the four arctic monitoring sites to verify the MK test results and to increase the confidence of detected step change points by the MK test. Figures …”
Section: Step Change Points Identified By Mtt and Yamamoto Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In climate and hydrological studies, three statistical methods have been widely used to identify abrupt climate change points. These are the Mann-Kendall (MK) test (Mann, 1945;Kendall, 1955), the moving t test (MTT) technique (Moraes, et al, 1998), and the Yamamoto method (Yamamoto et al, 1985).…”
Section: Statistical Test For Pop Trends and Step Changementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The abrupt climate change is described as the system transitioning from one stable state to another (Thom, 1972;Tong et al, 2014), i.e., the system swings between different states (Lorenz, 1976;Charney and DeVore, 1979), and it also has been verified in the climate system (Dai et al, 2012;Baker and Charlson, 1990;Wang et al, 2012;Alley et al, 2003;Xiao et al, 2011). Detection methods (Wan and Zhang, 2008;Fu and Wang, 1992;Yamamoto et al, 1986) have been greatly developed. Since the abrupt change theory was developed, increasing numbers of research (Goossens and Berger, 1986;Feng et al, 2008Feng et al, , 2011Stefan, 2002) studies have been launched.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detection results of traditional methods for detecting abrupt change, such as Moving t-test, Cramer method, Mann-Kendall test (Mann, 1945;Kendall and Charles, 1975) and Yamamoto method (Yamamoto et al, 1985), all highly depend on the length of subseries, namely analysed timescales (He et al, 2008). However, the timeinstant of abrupt dynamic change does not have certain relations with specific timescales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%