2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2008.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Climatological mean and decadal change in surface ocean pCO2, and net sea–air CO2 flux over the global oceans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

166
2,606
14
33

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,970 publications
(2,919 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
166
2,606
14
33
Order By: Relevance
“…This is supported by the "cGENIE" Earth system model estimates with Eocene boundary conditions for offshore Tanzania (Extended Data Fig. 6) 37 ; nevertheless, to include the uncertainty of potential disequilibrium with the atmosphere we added ±40 p.p.m. CO 2 uncertainty into our estimates of atmospheric CO 2 using δ 11 B.…”
Section: Site Informationmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This is supported by the "cGENIE" Earth system model estimates with Eocene boundary conditions for offshore Tanzania (Extended Data Fig. 6) 37 ; nevertheless, to include the uncertainty of potential disequilibrium with the atmosphere we added ±40 p.p.m. CO 2 uncertainty into our estimates of atmospheric CO 2 using δ 11 B.…”
Section: Site Informationmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…We notice that this flux only represents 12−26% of the currently best estimated global continental shelf CO 2 sink of ß−0.25 PgC yr −1 Laruelle et al 2010) and does not balance the CO 2 source from inner estuaries (ß+0.25 PgC yr −1 ) ( Table 7.1). The global river plume CO 2 sink is much smaller compared with the CO 2 sink in the open ocean ranging between −1.4 PgC yr −1 and −2.2 PgC yr −1 (Gruber et al 2009;Takahashi et al 2009). We acknowledge that this global plume CO 2 sink estimate is very crude.…”
Section: A Tentative Estimate Of Global River-plume Co 2 Fluxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To generate the annual mean fields of DIC and ALK for the nominal year 1997, we started with the observed climatology of Takahashi et al (2009) from the year 2000, and then calculated ALK and DIC following Lenton et al (2012) using the annual mean sea surface and salinity from WOA2005 from Locarnini et al (2006) and Antonov et al (2006) respectively. To correct the DIC to 1997, we used the observed global atmospheric growth rate from Mauna Loa (Earth System Research Laboratory, 2009) and the approximation of the Revelle factor (Sarmiento and Gruber, 2006).…”
Section: P R Oke Et Al: Evaluation Of a Near-global Eddy-resolvingmentioning
confidence: 99%