2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jastp.2010.08.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Climatology of ionospheric upper transition height derived from COSMIC satellites during the solar minimum of 2008

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
28
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4a) th solar minimum, the transition height reduced quickly, even lower than 660 km in daytime around LT 10:30. Yue et al (2010) studied the ionospheric transition height derived from COS-MIC satellite, and they found that the transition height was very low, with significant local time, latitude and seasonal variations, during the extremely low solar minimum of 2008. From their results, during June-August around LT 10:00 and 22:00, the transition heights were all lower than 600 km within the latitude of ±10°, which well coincided with the results in daytime in this paper.…”
Section: The Spatial Distribution Of H + From Dmsp Satellitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…4a) th solar minimum, the transition height reduced quickly, even lower than 660 km in daytime around LT 10:30. Yue et al (2010) studied the ionospheric transition height derived from COS-MIC satellite, and they found that the transition height was very low, with significant local time, latitude and seasonal variations, during the extremely low solar minimum of 2008. From their results, during June-August around LT 10:00 and 22:00, the transition heights were all lower than 600 km within the latitude of ±10°, which well coincided with the results in daytime in this paper.…”
Section: The Spatial Distribution Of H + From Dmsp Satellitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies on the transition height and its spatial and temporal variations can be found in the literature. All these studies principally employ two different observational techniques to determine the transition height: (i) ion composition measurements by in situ sensors [e.g., Miyazaki , ; Kutiev et al ., ; Gonzalez et al ., ; Heelis et al ., ] or by incoherent scatter radars [e.g., Hysell et al ., ] and (ii) altitudinal profiles of ion density measured by topside or ground‐based sounders [e.g., Titheridge , ; Webb et al ., ; Kutiev et al ., ; Marinov et al ., ; Kutiev and Marinov , ] and GPS radio occultation [e.g., Yue et al ., ]. A detailed description of the variation of transition height is provided by Titheridge [] who used theoretical ion density profiles (described by analytical functions) to fit with topside profiles observed by Alouette‐1 by iteratively changing the temperature, temperature gradient, and transition height until a best fit was obtained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Miyazaki [] explained this increase in the transition height as due to charged particle temperature increase and upward movement of O + ion density. On the other hand, the transition heights derived using the shape and/or scale height of topside ion density profiles [ Marinov et al ., ; Kutiev and Marinov , ; Yue et al ., ] show a distinct maximum around the geomagnetic equator and a decrease with latitudes away from the equator. This discrepancy observed in Marinov et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations