2006
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.0805-06.2006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Climbing Fiber-Evoked Endocannabinoid Signaling Heterosynaptically Suppresses Presynaptic Cerebellar Long-Term Potentiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
47
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results indicate that mAChR activation has a suppressive effect on LTP induction at PF-Purkinje cell synapses. The blockade of presynaptic LTP via retrograde cannabinoid signaling and CB1R activation is reminiscent of our previous description of a cannabinoid-mediated suppression of LTP resulting from application of the PF-LTP induction protocol (8-Hz, 15-s PF tetanization) combined with CF stimulation at 1-4 Hz (28). Because more prolonged pairing of PF and CF activity can lead to PF-LTD (39), the putative cellular correlate of cerebellar learning (40,41; but see ref.…”
Section: Cholinergic Signaling Modulates Synaptic Plasticity In the Cmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our results indicate that mAChR activation has a suppressive effect on LTP induction at PF-Purkinje cell synapses. The blockade of presynaptic LTP via retrograde cannabinoid signaling and CB1R activation is reminiscent of our previous description of a cannabinoid-mediated suppression of LTP resulting from application of the PF-LTP induction protocol (8-Hz, 15-s PF tetanization) combined with CF stimulation at 1-4 Hz (28). Because more prolonged pairing of PF and CF activity can lead to PF-LTD (39), the putative cellular correlate of cerebellar learning (40,41; but see ref.…”
Section: Cholinergic Signaling Modulates Synaptic Plasticity In the Cmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Because more prolonged pairing of PF and CF activity can lead to PF-LTD (39), the putative cellular correlate of cerebellar learning (40,41; but see ref. 42), and because cannabinoids are required for this process (43), it was hypothesized that the role of cannabinoid signaling in LTD induction is to prevent a simultaneous potentiation of transmitter release from diluting the consequences of postsynaptic depression (28). It is possible that in the vestibulocerebellum muscarinic input functions in a similar capacity as that of the CF; that is, it is delivered in a context-dependent fashion and decreases the likelihood of induction for different forms of LTP, potentially enhancing the overall penetrance of LTD. Our data show that the LTD mechanism itself is not affected by mAChR activation, which had seemed possible considering that mAChRs share downstream effectors with mGluR1 (PLC/DAG signaling cascade) in a signaling pathway that is essential for cerebellar LTD (44,45).…”
Section: Cholinergic Signaling Modulates Synaptic Plasticity In the Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast to the form of LTD described in this study, these CB1 The role of endocannabinoids in PF long-term plasticity had been less clear. It has been shown that climbing fiberevoked endocannabinoid signaling can suppress PF presynaptic LTP [43]. Regehr and coworkers found that CB1 receptor activation did not cause persistent modification of presynaptic PF mechanisms but proposed that CB1 receptors control the expression of postsynaptic PF-PN LTD [6,36].…”
Section: Demonstration Of Preltdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is one report that suggested that an NMDA/NO cascade is involved in presynaptically expressed PF-PN LTP (Jacoby et al, 2001). Any stringent evaluation of presynaptic PF-PN LTP has been hindered by the fact that the locus of presynaptic expression could only be indirectly inferred from changes in paired-pulse facilitation (Salin et al, 1996;Storm et al, 1998;Lonart et al, 2003;van Beugen et al, 2006) and an increase in the frequency of miniature EPSCs after forskolin application (Chen and Regehr, 1997;Jacoby et al, 2001). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%