This paper is a modest attempt to study legal pluralism in rural China, using rural legal services as a case study. 1 The paradox of the provision of legal services in rural China is the conflicting imperatives between providing localized services at the grass-roots level and the lure of legal professionalism. The greatest strength of rural legal service providers is the way they are embedded in the rural social and political setting, the geographic and social proximity to villagers, the personal touch in their work, and the trust they obtain from their clients based on the personal knowledge of the rural communities in which they serve. Simply put, there is a particular legal need, and rural legal service providers effectively fill the gap.Yet, there are strong ideological and economic forces pulling the rural legal service providers away from their grass-roots. The calling of an emerging legal professionalism (and the related financial incentives) demands a certain degree of legal knowledge and qualification, rules of procedure, code of conduct and regularity in legal practice. Gradually, there is a separation between the public and the private legal service providers in the Chinese countryside. In order to survive in an increasingly competitive legal market (even in rural areas), rural legal service providers have to run legal practices as a business. Hence rural legal services are torn between a service idea and a profit-making (survival) motive.It is an important policy issue to strike a proper balance between public and private delivery of legal services in the Chinese rural areas. Firstly, rurality creates natural barriers for rural residents in limiting the availability of public services including legal ones (Fu, 2003;Michelson, 2007aMichelson, , 2008Liu, 2011). The problem is structural and improvement in delivery through information technology has had only limited impact. Secondly, private delivery of legal services in rural areas is costly, ineffective and not sustainable. Lawyers are economically driven and legal services are market driven (Abel, 1989). They cluster in commercial centers in China and there is an apparent market failure. Thirdly, to correct this failure, the government would need to step in to provide or supplement legal services in rural areas by introducing a public dimension of legal services. Politics may ameliorate where the legal service market fails as the development of legal aid services in Western democracies has amply demonstrated (Abel, 1985;Gray, 1994;Flood and Whyte, 2006). This paper offers a glimpse of this tension by examining rural legal services in China.
Rural legal services: history and institutional frameworkThere are currently two tiers of legal service providers at the rural county level in China and, within each tier there are both a public component and a private component. The upper and professional