2012
DOI: 10.1117/1.jnp.6.061803
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Climbing the Jaynes–Cummings ladder by photon counting

Abstract: We present a new method to observe direct experimental evidence of Jaynes-Cummings nonlinearities in a strongly dissipative cavity quantum electrodynamics system, where large losses compete with the strong light-matter interaction. This is a highly topical problem, particularly for quantum dots in microcavities where transitions from higher rungs of the Jaynes-Cummings ladder remain to be evidenced explicitly. We compare coherent and incoherent excitations of the system and find that resonant excitation of the… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A four‐photon bundle on the other hand would not constrain two frequencies, as is the case of Eqs. (–d) and, beside, it is known that a fourth‐order process is not detectable by a third‐order correlator . Since all the observed resonances are accounted for by the processes highlighted and that, in turn, all these processes produce a resonance in the computed correlation spectrum, the characterization of the photon correlations is indeed comprehensive.…”
Section: Leapfrog Processesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…A four‐photon bundle on the other hand would not constrain two frequencies, as is the case of Eqs. (–d) and, beside, it is known that a fourth‐order process is not detectable by a third‐order correlator . Since all the observed resonances are accounted for by the processes highlighted and that, in turn, all these processes produce a resonance in the computed correlation spectrum, the characterization of the photon correlations is indeed comprehensive.…”
Section: Leapfrog Processesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…1a. The relative positions of the emission peaks are determined by the transient energies of the Jaynes-Cummings (JC) ladder 19 ( Fig. 1b).…”
Section: -6mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1a at ∆ σa = −85 pm and shows a small hump of QD-like polaritonic emission on top of a Lorentzian cavity-like resonance. An excellent fit (black line) is obtained with a quantum-optical JC transmission model 19,21 (see Methods). Next, we returned the sample focus to again destructively interfere the cavity and continuum channels.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The condition given by (1) implies that the Rabi splitting observed will be given by R = g 2 − γ 2 − and that * nquesada@physics.utoronto.ca the bare mode (light and matter) populations will oscillate at the same modified Rabi frequency [12]. Although the Rabi spliting between the modes can be explained using a classical model, the "quantumness" of the socalled linear Strong Coupling can be observed by other means, such as the counting statistics of the emitted photons [11,14,15]. To evidence quantum behavior in the photoluminescence spectrum not affordable by classical oscillators, one has to consider the case in which more than one photon are bound to the matter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, no systematic study has been presented of the dynamics in the non linear regime including decoherence. This is a relevant problem in quantum dots in microcavitites in which the effects of the environment on the quantum dot are quite strong and more importantly the quality factor of the cavities places the system in an intermediate regime [14,19]. Understanding the dynamics of photons and qubits in a regime where the losses are comparable to the light-matter coupling, is relevant in several areas of quantum information processing in which the light mode acts as an information bus between processor qubits [34][35][36][37][38][39] and in general, as a test bed in which multipartite entanglement can be studied [40][41][42][43].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%