2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02545.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical advantages of computer‐guided implant placement: a systematic review

Abstract: The limited scientific evidence available suggests that guided placement has at least as good implant survival as conventional protocols. However, several unexpected procedure-linked adverse events during guided implant placement indicate that the clinical demands on the surgeon were no less than those during conventional placement. A clinical advantage with flapless guided surgery is that the technique is likely to decrease pain and discomfort in the immediate postoperative period.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
154
0
11

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 179 publications
(171 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
6
154
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…In this way, they found a 0.99-mm horizontal deviation (ranging from 0.0 to 6.5 mm) at the level of the implant platform of the osseointegrated implants, a 1.24-mm horizontal deflection (ranging from 0.0 to 6.9 mm) at the osseointegrated implant apex, and an average angle deviation of 3.81 (ranging from 0.0 to 24.0 ) to the longitudinal osseointegrated implant axis. 15,16 In the field of oral implant dentistry, these values have a major effect on cases of low bone mass and other challenging anatomic structures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this way, they found a 0.99-mm horizontal deviation (ranging from 0.0 to 6.5 mm) at the level of the implant platform of the osseointegrated implants, a 1.24-mm horizontal deflection (ranging from 0.0 to 6.9 mm) at the osseointegrated implant apex, and an average angle deviation of 3.81 (ranging from 0.0 to 24.0 ) to the longitudinal osseointegrated implant axis. 15,16 In the field of oral implant dentistry, these values have a major effect on cases of low bone mass and other challenging anatomic structures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 The values defining the accuracy of guided splints depend on various factors, such as the type of study, type of support, planning software, techniques used to fabricate the splint, discrepancy between drill and cylinder guide, degree of wear and tear the drill is subjected to, or number of guides used. 15,16 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Klinische Studien haben gezeigt, dass die Implantatüberlebensrate von mittels CAIPP eingesetzter Implantate vergleichbar mit konventionell eingesetzten Implantaten ist [13]. -Die Planung einer Implantation muss anatomische und prothetische Aspekte beinhalten und das…”
Section: Komplikationen Und Limitationen Der Methodseunclassified
“…In addition, owing to many different bacteria species harboring on teeth, tongue, gingiva, and the surrounding soft tissues, the oral environment is inhabited [48]. Over the past years, numerous studies have shown that, compared with the traditional dental surgery, the computer-assisted flapless surgery can decrease the incidence of surgery-related bacteremia, complications and discomfort in the immediate postoperative period significantly [49,50]. For the purpose of improving the surgical skills, the training system may be beneficial for the surgeons to perform the flapless surgery.…”
Section: Expert Commentarymentioning
confidence: 99%