2017
DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2017.09.124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical analyses on salvage lymphadenectomy through cervical incision for patients with cervical and cervicothoracic recurrences after esophagectomy

Abstract: Background: Locoregional recurrences are often observed after esophagectomy with lymphadenectomy.The treatment strategy for these patients has not been established completely. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognosis of salvage lymphadenectomy through the cervical incision for cervical and cervicothoracic recurrences. Results: The median disease-free survival (DFS) was 8 months. The median PSL-OS was 40 months (95% CI: 8.850-71.150). The 1-, 2-, 3-and 5-year PSL-OS rate were 87%, 58%, 52% and 41… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Once the treatment failure occurs, most patients have a poor prognosis and die within 1 year [8,9]. At present, the main salvage treatment options for patients with postoperative recurrence include surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and chemoradiotherapy, while the curative effect is not ideal [10][11][12], and the optimal treatment regimen needs to be determined. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy can improve the overall survival rate (OS) and local tumor control rate of patients, but neoadjuvant radiotherapy often increases the difficulties associated with surgery due to tissue edema and hemorrhage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once the treatment failure occurs, most patients have a poor prognosis and die within 1 year [8,9]. At present, the main salvage treatment options for patients with postoperative recurrence include surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and chemoradiotherapy, while the curative effect is not ideal [10][11][12], and the optimal treatment regimen needs to be determined. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy can improve the overall survival rate (OS) and local tumor control rate of patients, but neoadjuvant radiotherapy often increases the difficulties associated with surgery due to tissue edema and hemorrhage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%