2008
DOI: 10.1007/s12032-008-9075-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical analysis of multiple primary malignancies in the elderly

Abstract: Elderly patients are more likely to develop MPM compared to younger ones. Significant cancer association according to field cancerogenesis concept was the one of smoking-related cancer; other MPM patterns were apparently a random phenomenon.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
37
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The implication of these findings is that geographical differences may also determine different genetic susceptibility in the same race. In addition, this study evaluated the problem of coexistent double cancer with ADSQ, and its prevalence was 9.09%, consistent with previous report of lung cancer [20]. However, Uramoto et al recently reported the proportion with coexistent double cancer of ADSQ was 45.5% [21].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The implication of these findings is that geographical differences may also determine different genetic susceptibility in the same race. In addition, this study evaluated the problem of coexistent double cancer with ADSQ, and its prevalence was 9.09%, consistent with previous report of lung cancer [20]. However, Uramoto et al recently reported the proportion with coexistent double cancer of ADSQ was 45.5% [21].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Studies based on tumor registries have reported the prevalence to be 1.8-6.4% [1][2][3][4][5] A recent study by Luciani et al [6] covering a three-year period in a single center showed an MPM prevalence of 10% with an mean age of 65. Their results show that it is more common in the elderly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although its incidence was low, accumulating cases with SPC has been diagnosed over the past decades. It was estimated that SPC occurred with the prevalence varying from 0.7% to 11.7% of all cancer patients, depending on different primary cancers (Luciani et al, 2009;Gursel et al, 2011). Additionally, the challenges of SPC to physicians had become of increasing concern because the treatment options to SPC could be limited due to its progression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%