1978
DOI: 10.2176/nmc.18pt2.191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Analysis of Postoperative Complications in 1, 000 Cases of Intracranial Saccular Aneurysms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11,19,27,29,57,61,70 In these studies, 17 of 686 patients died after operation (2.5%; 95% CI, 1.5% to 3.9%). Data on morbidity were available in 5 of 7 studies: 80 of 629 patients had postoperative sequelae (12.7%; 95% CI, 10.1% to 15.3%).…”
Section: Subgroup Analysis Of Studies Of Good Qualitymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…11,19,27,29,57,61,70 In these studies, 17 of 686 patients died after operation (2.5%; 95% CI, 1.5% to 3.9%). Data on morbidity were available in 5 of 7 studies: 80 of 629 patients had postoperative sequelae (12.7%; 95% CI, 10.1% to 15.3%).…”
Section: Subgroup Analysis Of Studies Of Good Qualitymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The mean (SD) speed quotient was 99-25 (10-8) compared with an expected score of 100 (15), the mean scale score for the WAIS. Similarities were 9-5 (2 5) compared with an expected score of 10 0 (3 0).…”
Section: B) One Year Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Of the 19 patients, 17 had an excellent or good outcome. Excellent or good results were reported between 50.4% and 90.6% of cases in the literature (14,23,29). Lee et al reported poor results in 126 patients with DACA aneurysms and the mortality rate was 0.9% (14).…”
Section: █ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The ages of the patients vary from 40.6 to 54 years in most of the publications (3)(4)(5)8,10,13,29,31). In our study, the ages of the patients were between 19 and 76 years with a mean age of 34 years and this result is similar with the literature (3)(4)(5)8,10,13,29,31). In our patient population, the female/male ratio was 4:1 and a female predominance is seen in the majority of the publications in varying proportions as 1.2:1 to 2:1 (2,12).…”
Section: █ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%