Clinical and Biomechanical Performance of Occlusal Veneers: A Scoping Review

Ladino, LuisGabriel; Sanjuan, Martin Eduardo; Valdéz, Darell Josué; Eslava, Rosa Angélica

doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3226

Cited by 13 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 42 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“… 16 To evaluate the clinical performance of such FCR over longer periods of time, long-term clinical studies are required. 28 , 29 …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, the ILF seems to be affected by the differences in the material thickness, partially rejecting the hypothesis that restoration thickness does not influence fracture resistance. A preliminary review recommended a ceramic material thickness between 0.7 and 1.0 mm 29 ; in addition, thicknesses less than 0.7 mm are recommended to be used in resin-based materials for occlusal veneers. The present study corroborates these statements because groups with a 0.5-mm thickness showed lower mean values that were statistically similar to 1 mm.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Thickness and Substrate Effect on the Mechanical Behaviour of Direct Occlusal Veneers

Tribst¹,

Tach²,

Kok³

et al. 2023

International Dental Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“… 16 To evaluate the clinical performance of such FCR over longer periods of time, long-term clinical studies are required. 28 , 29 …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Thickness and Substrate Effect on the Mechanical Behaviour of Direct Occlusal Veneers

Tribst¹,

Tach²,

Kok³

et al. 2023

International Dental Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…(Figure 2) Light curing of every surface for 20 seconds. Collection of natural teeth 16 Recently extracted human maxillary molars for orthodontic or periodontal reasons were carefully chosen to be used in this study. The molars were picked with meticulous inspection using 3.5X magnifying loupes (UNIVET LOUPES Spa) to guarantee they were caries, defects, and cracks free.…”

Section: Surface Treatment and Cementation Of The Occlusal Veneersmentioning

confidence: 99%

Wear behavior of bonded occlusal veneers constructed from machine milled glass and polymer infiltrated ceramics in contact with enamel: An in vitro study

Zaky¹,

Haleem²,

Kotb³

2023

Int. J. Appl. Dent. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Statement of problem:Occlusal veneer is considered an extra-coronal restoration with less invasive preparation. Yet there is a shortage of information as regards the wear behavior of materials from which occlusal veneers are manufactured and their opposing enamel. Purpose: Evaluate the wear of bonded occlusal veneers constructed from two dissimilar materials along with their opposing enamel following chewing simulation. Material and Methods: 16 table tops of two dissimilar materials "lithium disilicate and polymer infiltrated ceramics" were manufactured with a complete digital workflow. The occlusal veneers were bonded in accordance with the manufacturer's directions to their corresponding epoxy resin dies. 2-body wear test with 49 N of mastication force and 37,500 cycles was done and wear behavior was determined by substance loss and roughness changes. Results:The weight loss of Rosetta SM occlusal veneers was higher than Vita Enamic occlusal veneers p value <0.0001 however, the roughness of enamel opposing Vita Enamic was statistically higher than Rosetta SM after wear simulation test p-value =0.02. Conclusions: Rosetta SM occlusal veneers have better wear resistance than Vita Enamic occlusal veneers. However, the Rosetta SM occlusal veneers showed better influence on the enamel antagonists in comparison to Vita Enamic occlusal veneers after wear simulation.

show abstract

“…12 Tooth structure preservation during preparation is crucial, requiring conservative veneer preparation and maintenance of enamel and marginal integrity. [13][14][15] To optimize veneer retention and resistance form, the tooth configuration should compress the cement, enhancing restoration adaptation, retention, and resistance. A successful prosthesis should endure occlusal forces and have a luting cement that is thin and uniformly distributed.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Various factors influence clinical outcomes, including adhesive, resin composite, luting technique, light‐curing mode, clinical protocol, and patient‐related factors 12 . Tooth structure preservation during preparation is crucial, requiring conservative veneer preparation and maintenance of enamel and marginal integrity 13–15 …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of veneers generated by the guided prosthetic tooth preparation system

Abulhamael,

Papathanasiou,

Kostagianni

et al. 2024

J Esthet Restor Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveThis in vitro study aimed to assess and contrast the marginal and internal adaptation of all‐ceramic prefabricated veneers manufactured via the FirstFit guided tooth preparation system against all‐ceramic veneers produced using the chairside Computer‐Aided Design/Computer Aided Manufacture (CAD/CAM) system following identical guided preparation protocols.Materials and MethodsTwo main groups were included, with 16 lithium disilicate veneers per group. Four typodonts were used for the test (FirstFit) and control CAD/CAM groups. Intraoral scans created master casts and preparation guides. Guides performed preparations on typodont teeth (two central incisors and two lateral incisors). Prepared teeth were scanned (CEREC Omnicam) to design and mill CAD/CAM veneers. Marginal gap thickness and cement space thickness were measured using light microscopy at four locations: marginal, cervical internal, middle internal, and incisal internal.ResultsNo significant difference existed between groups for marginal adaptation (p = 0.058) or incisal internal adaptation (p = 0.076). The control group had significantly lower values for middle internal adaptation (p = 0.023) and cervical internal adaptation (p = 0.019).ConclusionsGuided preparation evaluation showed no significant differences in marginal or incisal internal adaptation. The CAD/CAM group had significantly lower middle and cervical internal adaptation values.

show abstract

Clinical and Biomechanical Performance of Occlusal Veneers: A Scoping Review

Cited by 13 publications

References 42 publications

Thickness and Substrate Effect on the Mechanical Behaviour of Direct Occlusal Veneers

Thickness and Substrate Effect on the Mechanical Behaviour of Direct Occlusal Veneers

Wear behavior of bonded occlusal veneers constructed from machine milled glass and polymer infiltrated ceramics in contact with enamel: An in vitro study

Evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of veneers generated by the guided prosthetic tooth preparation system

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About