2015
DOI: 10.2147/mb.s70369
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical and ethical perspectives on brain death

Abstract: Death determined by neurological criteria, or brain death, is an accepted legal standard for death throughout much of the world. However, brain death has also been a source of controversy ever since its inception, and recently it has been subjected to increased scrutiny, both in academia and in the public domain. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the literature on brain death, with a focus on clinical and ethical perspectives on the topic. To provide context, the history and legal standard… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
23
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas the Harvard standard requires the complete silence of the nervous system (Harvard Medical School 1968, 338), 19 the AAN guidelines affirm that the presence of a whole host of clinical signs, such as profuse sweating, blushing, tachycardia, sudden increase in blood pressure, motor stretch reflexes, Babinski reflex, and spontaneous movements of the limbs, is compatible with death (Wijdicks 1995, 1007). In other words, the change from the Harvard standard to the AAN guidelines is a post hoc move in order exclude those functions that are preserved in brain-dead patients as irrelevant, which then makes it possible to uphold the claim that BD is death (Nguyen 2019, 298–302; Nair-Collins 2015, 74). With its assertion that the presence of neuroendocrine function, reflexes, and spontaneous movements is compatible with death, the AAN standard contradicts both scientific realism and the tenets of sound anthropology, in particular, Christian anthropology as held and taught by the Catholic Church (Nguyen 2019).…”
Section: Critical Analysis Of the Arguments For The Revision Of The Uddamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Whereas the Harvard standard requires the complete silence of the nervous system (Harvard Medical School 1968, 338), 19 the AAN guidelines affirm that the presence of a whole host of clinical signs, such as profuse sweating, blushing, tachycardia, sudden increase in blood pressure, motor stretch reflexes, Babinski reflex, and spontaneous movements of the limbs, is compatible with death (Wijdicks 1995, 1007). In other words, the change from the Harvard standard to the AAN guidelines is a post hoc move in order exclude those functions that are preserved in brain-dead patients as irrelevant, which then makes it possible to uphold the claim that BD is death (Nguyen 2019, 298–302; Nair-Collins 2015, 74). With its assertion that the presence of neuroendocrine function, reflexes, and spontaneous movements is compatible with death, the AAN standard contradicts both scientific realism and the tenets of sound anthropology, in particular, Christian anthropology as held and taught by the Catholic Church (Nguyen 2019).…”
Section: Critical Analysis Of the Arguments For The Revision Of The Uddamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When he suffered an accident and was declared brain-dead, his parents, who were not against organ donation, wanted mechanical ventilation discontinued prior to organ removal. Neither the parents nor the patient knew that organ donation in BD takes place while the donor remains on a ventilator and with a beating heart (Nair-Collins 2015, 78).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are at least 30 known cases of pregnant women having been physiologically supported for up to 107 days to gestate a fetus 15 16 ; a young boy meeting ‘brain death’ criteria was physiologically supported for 20 years 17 ; and more recently, a young woman has been maintained on home ventilation for over 3 years following the diagnosis of ‘brain death’. 18 …”
Section: ‘Brain Death’ Pathophysiology and The Role Of Medical Technomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultimately, the National Organ and Tissue Transplant Organization (NOTTO) needs to be strengthened so that it may play a central role in coordinating the activities of deceased organ donation. 6 Clinical guidelines for determining brain death are not consistently validated by the presence of irreversible brain stem ischemic injury or necrosis at autopsy. They do not, therefore, completely exclude the reversible loss of integrated neurological functions in those certified as potential donors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%