2022
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05151-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical and functional outcomes of isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients over the age of 40 years

Abstract: Background To assess clinical and functional outcomes of patients aged 40 years or older receiving PCL reconstruction surgery. Methods All patients older than 40 years with isolated PCL rupture who underwent PCL reconstruction surgery were enrolled into the retrospective study. Associated meniscal injuries, osteochondral lesions, postoperative complications, and the rate of return to the preinjury level of activity were extracted. Outcomes included… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In light of this, some of our secondary analyses may have been underpowered; specifically, we found a trend toward differences in IKDC scores among PCL tear location subgroups that did not reach statistical significance (femoral-sided vs midsubstance vs tibial-sided; P = .07). However, the largest magnitude group difference among these 3 subgroups was 8.5 points (does not exceed recently reported IKDC minimal clinically important difference values of 16.8 and 16.7 from studies of Liu et al 30 and Chen et al, 8 respectively). Further, patient outcomes data in a cohort with a high proportion of MLKI, as in the present cohort, are vulnerable to confounding because of concomitant injuries.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…In light of this, some of our secondary analyses may have been underpowered; specifically, we found a trend toward differences in IKDC scores among PCL tear location subgroups that did not reach statistical significance (femoral-sided vs midsubstance vs tibial-sided; P = .07). However, the largest magnitude group difference among these 3 subgroups was 8.5 points (does not exceed recently reported IKDC minimal clinically important difference values of 16.8 and 16.7 from studies of Liu et al 30 and Chen et al, 8 respectively). Further, patient outcomes data in a cohort with a high proportion of MLKI, as in the present cohort, are vulnerable to confounding because of concomitant injuries.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…No major complications were noted, with a minimum follow-up time of two years. Approximately half of the patients returned to activities at their preinjury level [35].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, there is a higher risk of knee joint dysfunction and secondary injuries (such as meniscus and cartilage damage) [31,32]. Good outcomes of CL surgery in middle-aged and older patients have also been reported [33,34]. Consequently, many patients may choose surgery to regain their previous level of activity.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%