2023
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awad315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical and genetic characterisation of a large Indian congenital myasthenic syndrome cohort

Kiran Polavarapu,
Balaraju Sunitha,
Ana Töpf
et al.

Abstract: Congenital myasthenic syndromes are a rare group of inherited disorders caused by gene defects associated with the neuromuscular junction and potentially treatable with commonly available medications such as acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and beta2 adrenergic receptor agonists. In this study we identify and genetically characterise the largest cohort of congenital myasthenic syndrome patients from India to date. Clinically suspected patients evaluated in a South Indian hospital between 2014–201… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 59 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prevalence varies across geographical territories. For example, mutations in glycosylation genes GFPT1 , DAPG1 , and GMPPB are more common in India [ 18 ]. For diagnosing CMS, a clinical tetrad can be defined as including fatigable weakness, prominent in ocular and other cranial muscles, childhood-onset, negative myasthenia gravis autoantibodies, and supportive electrophysiological data in the form of positive slow RNS or abnormal single fiber EMG [ 17 , 19 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevalence varies across geographical territories. For example, mutations in glycosylation genes GFPT1 , DAPG1 , and GMPPB are more common in India [ 18 ]. For diagnosing CMS, a clinical tetrad can be defined as including fatigable weakness, prominent in ocular and other cranial muscles, childhood-onset, negative myasthenia gravis autoantibodies, and supportive electrophysiological data in the form of positive slow RNS or abnormal single fiber EMG [ 17 , 19 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%