We recently described a model of Th1 recall responses based on segmental antigen challenge with purified protein derivative of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (PPD). Bronchoscopic instillation of 0.5 tuberculin units of PPD resulted in localized lymphocytic inflammation in PPD-positive subjects only. Recruited lymphocytes were predominantly CD4ϩ and were enriched for cells capable of PPDspecific interferon (IFN)-␥ production. In the current study, we investigated the mechanisms by which this localized recall response is mobilized. Bronchoscopic PPD challenge of skin test-positive subjects resulted in the production of CXCR3 ligands IFN-␥-inducible protein (IP)-10 and monokine induced by IFN-␥ (Mig), but not of CCR5 ligands macrophage inflammatory protein-1␣ and regulatedupon activation, normal T-cell expressed and secreted, whereas skin test-negative subjects produced none of these chemokines. The great majority of individuals infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis do not develop active disease, but instead develop specific cell-mediated immunity that is manifest clinically by the development of positive skin-test responses to purified protein derivative of M. tuberculosis (PPD) (1). Skin-test responsiveness is associated with relative protection against subsequent infection with M. tuberculosis (2), although the mechanisms by which this protection is mediated remain poorly understood. We previously sought to establish a model of M. tuberculosis-specific recall responses in the human lung to provide a means to investigate the local responses of immune individuals upon re-exposure to the organism. To do so, we adapted the technique of bronchoscopic segmental antigen challenge that had previously been used extensively to characterize the local Th2-mediated immune responses in the lungs of individuals with atopic asthma using challenge with allergens such as ragweed (3-5). We instead used PPD as the challenge antigen, and compared responses of naturally infected skin test-positive subjects with those of healthy PPD-negative control subjects. A baseline bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was performed, followed by administration of 0.5 tuberculin units (TU) of PPD (i.e., 1/10th of the standard skintest dose) into the challenged segment and a control instillation of 10 cc of normal saline into a corresponding segment of the contralateral lung. Repeat BAL of control and challenged segments was performed 48 h later.In our initial studies, we demonstrated that bronchoscopic challenge with PPD resulted in a localized inflammatory response in challenged lung segments of PPD-positive subjects only. Compared with BAL of both baseline and control lung segments of these subjects, PPD-challenged segments displayed a 2.7-fold increase in the total BAL cells and an increase in the percentage of BAL lymphocytes from 10% to 19%. PPDchallenged segments of skin test-positive subjects also displayed an increased percentage of CD4ϩ T cells, and were enriched for cells capable of antigen-specific production of interferon (IFN)-␥ in response to ...