2013
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfs606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical and histological predictors of long-term kidney graft survival

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Establishment of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing, Eurotransplant and other databases have lead the way in identifying donor and recipient features and measures of renal function which act as indicators of long-term transplant success, including cold ischemia time, deceased versus living donor and body mass index. 1,2 Although donors and recipients are matched for clinical features shown to maximize transplant success, some immediate and early complications can occur after transplantation, including hemorrhage, thrombosis, intra-abdominal infection, and acute rejection. 1,3 Many of these are treatable with surgery or changes in immunosuppressant/induction regimes, leading to 90% to 95% of cadaveric donor organs and approximately 100% of living donor organs still functioning 1 year after transplantation.…”
Section: Kidney Transplantation In Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Establishment of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing, Eurotransplant and other databases have lead the way in identifying donor and recipient features and measures of renal function which act as indicators of long-term transplant success, including cold ischemia time, deceased versus living donor and body mass index. 1,2 Although donors and recipients are matched for clinical features shown to maximize transplant success, some immediate and early complications can occur after transplantation, including hemorrhage, thrombosis, intra-abdominal infection, and acute rejection. 1,3 Many of these are treatable with surgery or changes in immunosuppressant/induction regimes, leading to 90% to 95% of cadaveric donor organs and approximately 100% of living donor organs still functioning 1 year after transplantation.…”
Section: Kidney Transplantation In Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 Although donors and recipients are matched for clinical features shown to maximize transplant success, some immediate and early complications can occur after transplantation, including hemorrhage, thrombosis, intra-abdominal infection, and acute rejection. 1,3 Many of these are treatable with surgery or changes in immunosuppressant/induction regimes, leading to 90% to 95% of cadaveric donor organs and approximately 100% of living donor organs still functioning 1 year after transplantation. Over time however kidney graft function declines, with greater than 50% of deceased donor transplanted kidneys failing within 10 years and greater than 50% of living related donor transplant kidneys failing within 17 to 18 years.…”
Section: Kidney Transplantation In Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These improvements in long‐term allograft outcomes have occurred despite an increased representation of features associated with graft failure over time such as increasing donor and recipient age, panel reactivity, HLA mismatches and time on dialysis (Table ) . Although improvements in longer term graft outcomes have also been reported elsewhere, particularly by other European programs and by Australia & New Zealand Dialysis & Transplant Registry (ANZDATA), these reports tend to lack the duration of follow‐up we present in this study .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Although new immunosuppressive drugs have made a major progress in improving renal graft outcome after transplantation, chronic allograft dysfunction (CAD) has remained an unsolved issue. 5,6 However, molecular pathways related to the progression of CAD act at an earlier step and their dysregulations may not be detected by the clinical methods. Indeed, CAD is recognized as a complex disease that is influenced by a range of genetics, epigenetic, and pharmacogenetic components.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%